In fact, the remote and or blended audit has led to so many auditor's never actually visiting you - again, brilliant!

This podcast is aimed at those on the receiving end of Certification Body and UKAS “blended audits” of Quality Management Systems - making life easier.

A well prepared Quality Manager will support your auditor to become quick and slick. 

Ask your Certification Body auditor for a "pre-audit" check-list of questions with clause by clause auditing timing - this will help you to help them - drive down your Certification costs by simple preparation.

Don't waste time "nattering" online. Keep to the audit plan. Feed you auditor with data and evidence. Ensure that you KPI's make sense - feed the auditor with facts. 

We have decided to provide a few suggestions prior to starting your audit. The main one is train the Quality Manager to be the "face of your business"; its all about presentation.

This podcast is based on how to make the “remote audit” a success for those sitting on both side of the table, summarized as follows:

1.       Contracts and non-disclosure agreements

2.       Technology communication testing

3.       Planning, timing and costing

4.       Information and data media

5.       Scope and duration

6.       Culture and environmental perspective

7.       Reporting the audit and follow-up

The “remote audit” is a completely different beast to norms of face to face auditing… it must be treated like a new technology… train yourselves on how to “present the case” for your business and quality management system.

Require support? Please contact us at The Assessment Register...
www.assessment-register.co.uk 

All the best.

Support the show

This is particularly key when you do not have design within your "factory production control" (FPC) scope of supply (and producing the product against the customer supplied product design specification).

Within the Construction Products Regulation [(EU) No 305/2011 also the applicable UK Statutory Instrument] clearly states that the "manufacture" is the one placing the product onto the market, and ultimately the one responsible the integrity of the UKCA Mark as applied.

(EU) No 305/2011 - see Article 2 Clause 19

This basic fact about the one placing the product onto the market, is a key requirement of all UKCA obligations. Consider:

a) BS 1090-1 Table ZA.3 – this is the tasks for the certification (approved) body when they visit you (the enterprise) – to review the FPC only against (clause 6.3 and this limited focus is as legislated within the CPR and may exclude “design” - (EU) No 305/2011 - see Article 2 Clause 26) and with reference to;

 b) Annex ZA.1 – the specification for the product as provided from the customer (or if design is within the FPC scope, the internal design requirements); as applicable to the product (and contract specification, as defined), with reference to;

 c) Annex B – the certification [approved] body will undertake an initial inspection and on-going inspection of the FPC (as per scope – with reference to Annex B.4.2) – basically, assess the effectiveness of the FPC with consideration to the above 1 and 2; and finally;

 d) ZA.3 ## – the certification [approved] body will review the “declaration of performance" UKCA Mark  certificate content as issued by the FPC – to include any NPD’s as confirmed within 2 above. 

Therefore, the Notified Body is awarding "certification" against the "factory production control" clause of BS 1090-1, 6.3 for the enterprise to issue  "declarations of performance" for UKCA Mark (at the point of dispatch from their FPC).

Where the FPC excludes design from the scope as confirmed with the Approved Body, then the legal responsibility for the product specification sits firmly with the customer and or their design experts (AKA the CPR manufacturer in law).

Why are we putting this out there?

So many Approved Bodies are bouncing SME fabrication welding firms into "non-conformances" due to the SME's customer NOT providing the correct information for the product. From customers not providing the EXC level through to bolts and weld test specifications not made clear.

However, in this regard, we recommend to all "non-design" BS 1090 firms to simply state NPD on their UKCA Marking "declarations of performance" (in line with the BS 1090 Annex ZA's). Clearly stating this within the "declaration of performance" to the customer specified requirements as per their drawing specification provided.

As a non-design BS 1090 firm, you cannot be permitted to deviate from the information provided from your customer (without written consent to do so, under for example a concession from the design authority - the customer); should you deviate from the customer contract specification, this would be a breach of contract and you would be liable for any failures.

Approved Bodies should focus on auditing with reference to the primary points of legal reference; the CPR and UKCA Marking, with reference to the scope limitations of the BS 1090 clause 6.3. The BS 1090 has become the focus of attention and not the legal frame-work - for safe product and compliance documentation, such as the agreed product specification for the product.

Support the show

Support the show

I decided to write about Wadhams Castle AKA Merryfield House and the historical Knightly deeds of King Arthur. Also acknowledging the philanthropist attributes of the Wadham family during their time at Wadhams Castle.  What else? Simply, I wanted to put Wadhams Castle back on the English map - it is a great place and it's where King Arthur became King of Wessex and then England.

What the historians say. Merryfield Castle is a moated site and its associated fishponds at Ilton are recommended for scheduling for the following principal reasons:

Survival: as a well-preserved example of a medieval moated site that is unencumbered by later development;

Potential: the survival of below-ground archaeology relating to the layout and type of structures that formerly occupied the moated island and waterlogged deposits have the potential to enhance our understanding of the construction, occupation and abandonment of the moated site;

Documentation: the existence of documentary evidence contributes to our knowledge of the site and its significance;

Historic interest: for its association since the C14 with the Wadhams, a wealthy and philanthropic family who founded Wadham College, Oxford in in the early C17.

For your FREE Kindle e-book go to - https://www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=the+moated+stone&i=stripbooks&ref=nb_sb_noss_1  

Support the show

Support the show

Unlike many other AS 9100 training courses, our “remote training” course program is delivered by true practitioners with an unchallenged reputation of ensuring Certification success. 

The course program provides a unique blend of practical implementation advice against those awkward clauses of the AS 9100 – providing proven examples when required.

We understand what the Certification Body requires from you to achieve AS 9100. Therefore, our primary focus is ensuring you successful development and implementation, through to compliance. We pride ourselves on delivering expertise for both improvement and technical compliance – we stand or fall by the quality of our AS 9100 training.

Course Objectives

Our “remote training” course program is dynamic and encourages complete delegate participation. All delegates are asked to provide us with a series of questions in advance of attending the course, relevant to specific needs to ensure we balance the course to the group – and answer your specific questions.

Our “remote training” is aimed at those already familiar with the requirements of "quality management systems". In addition, fir those seeking to have a better understanding of the aerospace and defence sector requirements - all your questions will be answered with a “no-nonsense” example to support compliance.

Course Tutor

With over 30 years of "quality management" and "conformity assessment" experience, within the private sector and government institutions. Successfully completed over 600 legal metrology, standards, testing and quality assurance projects within the UK and internationally. From AS 9100 and ISO 9001 to ISO 17025 and AQAP to CAA JAR 145, from engineering apprentice, compliance manager to senior civil servant... to include sector scheme development for trading standards... rest assured, our course tutor is a true practitioner that won't disappoint. 

After listening to this podcast, contact and book your place. We can also deliver this training course program one-on-one remotely or at your organization if preferred.

Email: info@assessment-register.co.uk

Support the show

The positive re-structure and re-launch of your business and what better management tool – ISO9001. In just 4 days, The Assessment Register team can quickly make you ready and manage your formal certification! The foundation of continuous improvement.

Yes, it is time to land the mother ship – the mother of all quality management system Standards – ISO 9001 is the cornerstone for competitive advantage and business improvement.

This podcast is a simple reminder about the benefits of ISO 9001 and related certification.

• Enhanced reputation
• Business improvement
• Commercial awareness
• Risk mitigation
• Resource planning
• Sustained development
• Quality assurance

…and above all, putting your business on the tender to bit for contracts.

Remind yourself of the benefits at your leisure – listen to the podcast and contact The Assessment Register for more information – www.assessment-register.co.uk 

Support the show

Support the show

From raw materials, such as – metals, alloys, carbon fiber, wood, packaging, food, etc. through to all matters of calibration – measurement integrity, standard reference materials for chemical analysis, legal metrology for trade, etc.

That Paper Trail – We traditionally underscore our confidence with “a paper chase” (or pdf's) from the supplier of materials or components, for example:

• Certificate of conformity (against a technical specification or part number)
• Declarations of performance (against a directive for CE / UKCA Marking)
• Mill certificate (from the – well… the mill)
• Test certificates (from those within the “process” responsible for inspection / testing).

However, remember…. just because you have the “paper trail” with a link to the “item” supplied, it does not mean that the material or product is correct or compliant.

No.... ISO 9001 and AS 9100 only require the management of "traceability" and not material or product compliance... for that, we must delve deeper!

Your customers are aware of the failures within the "supply chain" and that is why customer contracts state "supplying materials and components with certification from a quality assured and approved supplier - does not absolve you the supplier from the responsibility of ensuring material compliance". 

This "podcast" will provide the necessary guidance for your consideration about how you manage your supply chain integrity - risk and mitigation.

Support the show

As signatory to the EA MLA the accreditation system operated by UKAS continues to be accepted by the other signatories as equivalent to their own accreditation system and declare, when requested, conformity assessment results (e.g. reports or certificates) issued by those accredited by UKAS for the relevant scope to the EA MLA, to the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (ILAC MRA) and to the IAF Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (IAF MLA) as reliable.

With this in mind, UKAS accreditation is recognized and accepted throughout the EU; does this mean that the UKCA Mark will be accepted throughout the EU in the same way as the CE Mark? 

Well, it certainly reads that way, because the UK has adopted all the EU legislative "product directives" into Statutory Instruments - otherwise, what would be the point of UKAS remaining a member of EA? If not to facilitate UK trade within the EU market?

In brief, when being audited and certificated against the BS 1090 in the UK (UKCA), this will translate into EN 1090 (CE), because it is one of the same (against the CPR).

That said, within the UK market, we have a keen focus on the NSSS 7th Edition, coupled with the “customer contract” specification being the “legal precedence” over the content of EN 1090. Refer to the NSSS 7th Edition clause 1.2.3, where the contract technical specification takes precedence over the EN 1090-2 content.

From the top and to recap:

·         Legal Framework - Compliance with the “Construction Products Regulation” (CPR) is the law within the UK (and the EU).

·         Product Declaration - Compliance with the “United Kingdom Conformity Assessment” (UKCA) is the law within the UK (as per the CE).

·         Legal Responsibility – Anyone that places a UKCA Marked product onto the UK market becomes the responsible manufacturer of the product in the eyes of the law.

The BS 1090 Certification is NOT the law in the UK (the customer contract and technical specification - takes precedence over the content of the EN 1090-2 / EN 1090-4). The CPR is the legal framework.

The BS 1090 simply provides a “small” point of reference for “Factory Production Control” as per BS 1090-1 Clause 6.3 and makes references to UKCA Marking. 

The legal reference for the UKCA Mark within the United Kingdom with reference to the CPR is the Statutory Instrument – UK SI1620 - previously known as the Regulation (EU) No 305/2011. Then we must also consider "professional and technical qualifications" of those involved with - structural design, the architect, the engineers, the auditors, etc. The customer contract agreement is key to compliance.

One other thing to consider. Just because UKAS is a part of EA, does not mean instant recognition of professional qualification - "UK professional qualifications may not be recognized in the EU (and vice versa), although the UK and EU member states could decide to unilaterally recognize each other’s professional qualifications or provide streamlined routes to re-qualification".

Support the show

Within “quality management system” circles, we are all aware that the law will take precedence over a voluntary Standard. In addition, a legally binding contract will also take precedence over a voluntary Standard. UK law around “forgery and counterfeiting” talks about “intending to deceive” through knowingly “imitating a product” and claiming it is the genuine thing.

This can be achieved by incorrectly-labelling the item, false or misleading certification, creating a similar brand, etc. things that will cause confused product messaging.

The AS 9100, IATF 16949 and ISO 9001 present the case for “product identification and traceability” and now “prevention of counterfeit” parts. So, nothing new, but an important consideration for the quality management system. We recommend that prevention should be an integral part of the following:

·         Supplier selection – known and quality assured suppliers

·         Purchasing – terms and conditions that reminds about counterfeit matters

·         Training – internal awareness training for those involved with the above and inspection

·         Non-conformance – reporting and containing potential counterfeit items

·         Reporting – to customer and the authorities 

…well that’s the summary… have a great listen and then visit: www.assessment-register.co.uk

Support the show

Support the show

Support the show

Support the show