The best support in Design and Technology rarely looks dramatic. It looks like a calm voice re-reading instructions, a bigger print-out placed quietly on a bench, a checklist that turns panic into progress, and a student realising they can finish what they started. I’m joined by Sarah, a Learning Support Assistant working closely with a D&T department, to explain what inclusion actually requires when lessons move between food tech, textiles, workshop making, and CAD.

We talk about why being attached to a department (rather than trailing a single pupil all day) builds confidence, consistency, and trust. Sarah breaks down key SEND and EHCP basics in plain language, then shares practical classroom strategies: sensory support such as ear defenders, problem-solving around smell in food rooms, and targeted scaffolding that still protects independence. We explore adaptive equipment for coordination and mobility needs, and how pupils can achieve the same outcomes through different routes, including smart alternatives during GCSE and NEA practical work.

A big takeaway is processing time. We unpack ways to reduce cognitive overload in demonstrations, use step-by-step photos and tangible models, and structure tasks so pupils can start, sustain effort, and feel the satisfaction of completion. Sarah also shares a research-informed task planner approach (influenced by the Education Endowment Foundation) that helps with time management, keywords, and motivation.

Subscribe, share with your DT community, and leave a review so more teachers and support staff can find the ideas and use them in real classrooms.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

I’ve been quiet on the podcast, and I wanted to be honest about why. The short version is not drama, it’s the reality of design and technology education work right now: drafting curriculum, managing confidentiality, and trying to protect enough headspace to do any of it well.

A big part of my time has been taken up with national curriculum work. I’m involved in drafting the new national curriculum for England, which comes with an NDA, so I’m careful about what I say and how it could be interpreted. Alongside that, I’ve been leading the writing of the technology and design curriculum for Northern Ireland, working with brilliant teachers and learning a lot about how different jurisdictions frame D&T, rigour, accessibility, and purpose.

I also talk through something more personal but very common in education and academia: the tension between public-facing work and institutional recognition. After applying for promotion, I had to reflect on whether an independently produced podcast can count as evidence, and what that means when I also believe D&T needs stronger status and leadership, including professorial voices in design and technology education across the UK.

You’ll also hear updates on the newsletter (Mailchimp limits and a possible move), editing the next edition of Learning to Teach Design and Technology in the Secondary School, and an international curriculum comparison project. If you’re in England, keep an eye out for the national curriculum consultation later in the year, and please get involved when it opens.

If you find this useful, subscribe, share it with your D&T department, and leave a review so more teachers can find the show. What topic would you like me to pick up next?

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

What happens when a senior leader who grew up in the workshop helps design three SEMH schools from the ground up? In this episoode, I sit down with Paul Quinn to unpack a bold, practical vision for Design and Technology that prioritises access, safety and pride in making. Instead of chasing every shiny gadget, Paul explains why reliable hand tools and a hard-working laser cutter deliver outsized gains for learners who need quick wins, clear routines and visible success they can take home.

We talk about Paul’s journey from mainstream D&T to leadership, exploring how accountability pressures squeezed creative subjects and why specialist provision offered a chance to redefine success. He shares the realities of equipping new workshops, including what paid off, what didn’t, and how the team kept the focus on learning rather than kit. Expect straight talking on 3D printers, the value of repetitive processes for regulation, and why textiles—introduced with careful safety planning—unlocked confidence for many students.

Throughout, we return to the simple truths that make D&T transformative in SEMH settings: short, well-structured lessons; culturally relevant projects; heavy scaffolding with teacher prep; and outcomes that look and feel good. When students are welcomed into spaces they were once excluded from, behaviour shifts, confidence grows and qualifications follow. This is practical pedagogy you can apply tomorrow—design for success, choose tools that fit your learners, and keep the relationship at the centre.

Subscribe for more conversations at the intersection of D&T, inclusion and real-world making, and share this episode with a colleague who’s rethinking their workshop. Leave a review to help others find the show, and tell us: what tool would you buy, and what would you skip?

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

A noisy workshop can feel like a storm, but what if the path to learning starts with rhythm, not rush? We sit down with D&T teacher Ailis Brown from a specialist SEMH school in Leeds to unpack how safety, trust, and regulation turn short lessons into meaningful progress. From clocks and board games to careful joinery, Ailis shows how a flexible bank of projects meets pupils where they are and gently moves them forward.

We compare mainstream pressures with the reality of SEMH: small classes that still stretch a teacher’s attention, 40-minute slots that yield 15–20 minutes of true learning, and the need to plan projects that run in parallel because attendance and readiness vary. You’ll hear how TAs act as experts on the child while the subject teacher guards the craft, and why writing individual objectives on the board can become a quiet briefing that keeps everyone aligned. The standout insight is rhythm: repetitive tasks like sanding and filing act as regulation tools, helping students steady their breathing, settle their senses, and rejoin cognitive work without confrontation.

Ailis is candid about shifting aims—from grade targets to life readiness—and honest about the moral weight of results-driven systems. We explore practical strategies for mainstream teachers supporting students with SEMH needs: build calm routines, reduce waiting, prepare fallback tasks that still feel purposeful, and remember the mantra, “you can’t fight chaos with chaos.” Expect takeaways you can try tomorrow, along with a renewed sense that design and technology isn’t just about products; it’s about giving young people a safe place to practise patience, precision, and pride.

If this conversation helped you rethink your workshop or classroom, subscribe, share it with a colleague, and leave a review so others can find it. Have thoughts or a story to add? Send a voice memo via Speakpipe or email us—links in the show notes.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Nicola Brown shares her experience teaching design and technology at Springwell Leeds North, an SEMH school catering to students aged 7-16 with social, emotional, and mental health needs. She discusses how building relationships, establishing micro-routines, and adapting teaching approaches helps students thrive in a subject that offers unique opportunities for personal development.

• Working with SEMH students requires understanding dysregulation and supporting emotional regulation
• Key Stage 2 (ages 7-10) sessions focus on basic skills like using scissors, threading, and completing small projects 
• Key Stage 3 students access a full workshop with power tools, building trust and respect
• Level 2 Construction and Arts Award qualifications are offered to Key Stage 4 students
• The school practices early transitions to reduce anxiety about the new school year
• Misconceptions about special schools are challenged - "it's just being in the right place for you at the right time"
• D&T education creates meaningful progression pathways to further education and employment
• Small class sizes (10 students with 3 adults) and specialized support enable personalised learning

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

A museum floor changed underfoot and so did my thinking. After a visit to the V&A’s Design and Disability exhibition, I came home energised and unsettled—in the best way—and unpack how inclusive design moves from a nice‑to‑have to the engine of real innovation and dignity. It caused me to question a stubborn myth: that able‑bodied designers solve problems for others. The stories on display point to something richer—design with, led and instigated by Disabled people, where everyday hacks and tools carry more power than glossy manifestos.

I connect those moments to our work in D&T education, including a new chapter by Debi Wynn on inclusion in and inclusion through design and technology. I talk about how accessibility has driven mainstream breakthroughs, like multi‑touch interfaces born from hand pain, and why policies such as the plastic straw ban can miss the mark when they ignore lived reality. Activism enters the frame too—kerb cuts, tactile paving, and accessible transport happened because people organised, pushed, and redesigned the rules.

Hopefully my chatter is practical and provocative: co‑design over token empathy, user research that doesn’t "other" people, modular solutions that embrace edge cases, and assessment that treats inclusion as a core quality attribute.

I also share what fell short—the exhibition book that couldn’t carry the feelings home.

If you care about design that serves everyone, and classrooms that teach students to lead with inclusion, you’ll find ideas here to test tomorrow.

Enjoyed the conversation? Subscribe, leave a review to help others find the show, and share it with your D&T community. Got thoughts or a story to add? Send a Speakpipe voice note or email—links in the show notes.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Ever been told art and design and technology are basically the same because they share the word “design”? Let’s test that claim with real data and grounded classroom experience. In this episode I unpack how teachers and stakeholders describe the value of D&T and the value of art and design, then draw a clear map of where they overlap, where they diverge, and what leaders risk when they blur them into one.

First, I outline five widely reported value themes for D&T: transferable skills, careers and the economy, the human–technology relationship, making and creating, and creative and critical thinking. These insights come from a larger, validated body of research and speak to the discipline’s focus on users, systems, materials and evidence through iterative making. Then we contrast early qualitative findings for art and design: career preparation, societal impact, skills for life, and creativity and expression. Here, empathy, cultural awareness and personal voice take centre stage, with a strong link to creative industries, innovation and sustainability. The conversation surfaces a simple truth: both subjects champion creativity and problem solving, yet each serves a distinct purpose that deserves protection.

I share practical ways to collaborate without erasing identity: agree non‑negotiables for cross-teaching, and design joint projects where D&T’s functional rigour and art’s expressive depth enrich each other rather than compete. This is a toolkit for faculties, middle leaders and senior teams who want the benefits of a shared banner without collapsing two powerful traditions into one bland compromise. If your timetable or staffing model pushes subjects together, this guide helps you hold the line—respectfully, clearly and with evidence.

Got thoughts or examples from your school? Add your voice to the ongoing survey, share the episode with your faculty, and help us build a richer, more rigorous picture of what these subjects offer. If you find value here, subscribe, leave a review, and pass it on to colleagues who care about getting design and the arts right for young people.

Link to the survey: https://bit.ly/Valueofdesigned 

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode, I'm excited to share three brilliant opportunities for you to get involved in research that's shaping the future of design and technology education. First, I'll tell you about the Redesigning Design and Technology project I'm co-leading with Ciaran, Andrew, and Amanda. We've identified 18 contentious questions that divide our community and created a survey where you can share your views on these crucial debates. This research feels particularly timely with England's curriculum and assessment review underway, and I believe teacher voices need to be heard loud and clear in policy discussions.

I'll also discuss the evaluation I'm leading of the Design and Technology Association's Inspired by Industry resources. Working alongside Kay Stables and my colleagues at Nottingham Trent, we're examining how these resources impact pupils' progress in D&T. It's a fantastic opportunity for participating schools to gather rich data about their own practice whilst contributing to sector-wide understanding.

Finally, I'm launching an urgent call for contributors to a new podcast series addressing special educational needs and disabilities in D&T. This is such an under-researched area, yet absolutely vital to our practice. Whether you're facing challenges or have developed innovative approaches, I want to hear from you.

Each of these projects represents a chance to contribute to evidence-based practice in our subject. They're about empowering teachers to shape research rather than simply consuming it. The insights we gather will benefit the entire D&T community.

What conversations about D&T practice do you think we need to be having more openly in our schools and professional networks?

Take part in the Redesigning D&T survey: https://bit.ly/ReDandT_Phase3

Join the evaluation of the Inspired by Industry projects: https://bit.ly/IBIinterest

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Reconnecting with purpose is essential when facing professional challenges. In this  reflective episode, I share my experience of an unsuccessful professorial application and how it prompted me to rediscover why I'm passionate about design and technology education in the first place.

The start of a new academic term offers the perfect opportunity to step back from the excitement and apprehension of returning to teaching and consider our fundamental values:

• What drives us to teach design and technology?
• Why do we advocate for this subject?

These questions matter because when we lose sight of our purpose, we risk becoming mechanical rather than inspirational in our practice.

Through conversations with colleagues working on the "Learning to Teach Design and Technology in Secondary School" book and planning a primary D&T podcast series, I've reconnected with what  motivates me – developing children's ability to make design decisions that shape their world and fostering critical engagement with the made environment. This renewed clarity came unexpectedly from various sources, including a chance conversation with my young cousin who simply chose to study subjects she loves.

I challenge you to reflect on your own D&T values as you begin this academic year. Perhaps create a mind map, discuss with colleagues, or identify your "word of the year" for teaching design and technology. Where do you find refreshment and challenge that keeps you passionate about the subject? 

Have you considered what values drive your teaching practice? Share your thoughts, subscribe to the podcast, and if you're using Inspired by Industry resources in your teaching this year, consider participating in our evaluation research project. Your voice matters in shaping the future of design and technology education.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Recommended read: 

Studio Properties: A field guide to design education (edited by Derek Jones ,  Elizabeth Boling,  James Benedict Brown ,  James Corazzo,  Colin M. Gray,  Nicole Lotz)

Derek Jones and Alice Hellard explore the concept of design studio as a transformative educational approach that extends beyond physical space to encompass social dynamics, extended cognition, and embodied knowledge.

• Design studio is not just a physical space but a collection of practices involving social interaction, extended cognition, and listening in
• Virtual design studios reveal important insights about how students learn through observation and "legitimate peripheral learning" 
• The process of enculturation into design practices requires students to develop confidence in the language and methods of design
• Studio practice allows students to externalize thinking through models and drawings as part of the cognitive process
• Current assessment frameworks often fail to recognize or value the types of knowledge central to design practice
• Implementing aspects of studio practice in secondary schools faces challenges but offers opportunities for more authentic design education
• Students need opportunities to design without predetermined outcomes, though this creates tensions with traditional assessment models

If you want to support the podcast financially, you can become a patron. Links to SpeakPipe, Patreon and my website are in the show notes.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Michelle Gregson, General Secretary and Chief Executive of NSEAD, discusses the relationship between art and design and design and technology education, exploring their distinctiveness while highlighting their shared values and challenges.

• NSEAD operates as a learned society, subject association, and specialist trade union for art and design education
• Both art and design and design and technology subjects face similar challenges of reduced curriculum time and resources
• Michelle describes a "spectrum of practice" where art and design focuses more on internal/artist expression while design and technology addresses external/user needs
• Curriculum "blurring" between subjects is often driven by budget constraints rather than pedagogical innovation
• Both subjects share dispositions like curiosity, critical thinking, and problem-solving but apply them with different intentions
• Creativity exists across both subjects but manifests differently depending on context
• Children lose authentic learning experiences when subjects are narrowed down to what can be taught cheaply
• Education should value children for who they are today, not just as "units of currency for the future"
• Both subjects uniquely give students opportunities to be in control of their learning

Find me at dralisonhardy.com where you can connect with me, support the podcast as a patron, or leave me a voice memo via SpeakPipe with your thoughts or ideas for future episodes.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

If you are interested in helping the Association evaluate their Inspired by Industry programme, sign up here: https://bit.ly/IBIinterest

What happens when we look beyond textbook projects and expose 11-14 year olds to real industry design challenges? Tony Ryan, Chief Executive of the Design and Technology Association, reveals how they're transforming technical education from the ground up through their ambitious "Inspired by Industry" programme.

Six years into his leadership role, Tony shares his passion for rebuilding design education with a fundamentally different approach: focusing on complex problem-solving rather than simply making products. "If we go to government and say, 'You need to back design and technology because we make stuff,' we're finished," he explains. Instead, they're creating resources that develop future innovators who can tackle "gnarly complex problems" with tenacity and creativity.

The Association has partnered with over 300 companies to create authentic, challenging design briefs that elevate student expectations. One example involves a professional designer's project creating dinosaur suits – not just costumes, but immersive experiences that teach ergonomics, materials science, and design thinking. These free resources include comprehensive teaching materials with videos featuring young professionals students can aspire to become.

Complementing this secondary focus is remarkable growth in primary school engagement, where 20% of English schools now hold membership. Through initiatives like "Projects on a Page" and equipment loan schemes for 3D printers and sewing machines, non-specialist teachers are gaining confidence in delivering high-quality technical education.

The work extends beyond resources to research and advocacy. A planned evaluation programme will measure outcomes, providing crucial evidence for lobbying efforts already yielding results – as seen in the recent House of Lords report calling for "urgent action" to address the decline in design education. As Tony puts it, their mission is creating a subject that's "design-driven" and produces students "not afraid of tackling complex problems and not just replicating what's been done before."

Explore how the Design and Technology Association is reimagining technical education for a generation that will change careers 16-17 times and interact with technology "at a pretty high level, whether they like it or not." The future of design education starts here.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Max Pownall is a product design lecturer at Nottingham Trent University.

Find out more about Max and his work:

• Instagram (NTU Focussed)
• LinkedIn
• Uni profile
• Final Year Degree online degree show

Mentioned in this episode

Events with Alison Hardy

The Design Thinking Toolbox

https://www.worldofbooks.com/en-gb/books/michael-lewrick/design-thinking-toolbox/9781119629191

Tools from the book at - https://en.dt-toolbook.com/t

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Holistic, summative assessment is essential for properly evaluating design and technology capability, drawing on research by Richard Kimball and Kay Stables that predates the National Curriculum and has been tested across multiple countries and age groups.

• Effective capability assessment tasks allow pupils to demonstrate ability to respond to an unfamiliar design contex
• Assessment focuses on students' design capability, not their knowledge of the specific context
• Teachers should provide resources for rapid immersion in the context without predetermined solutions
• Real-time assessment is more authentic than extended assessments over weeks
• "Unpickled portfolios" are raw and produced in real time, unlike "pickled portfolios" which become formulaic and focused on presentation
• Successful capability assessment requires student ownership, allowing innovation and prototype testing
• Holistic judgment approaches like comparative assessment provide reliable evaluation methods
• Assessment should support curriculum aims rather than distort them

Resources and References from Episode 4: Holistic Evaluation: The True Measure of Design & Technology Capability

1. Research by Richard Kimbell and Kay Stables on holistic, summative assessment of design and technology capability
   • Pre-national curriculum research from 1992 onwards
   • Tested across different countries and age groups
   • Research on comparative judgment as a reliable method of assessment
2. STEM website where much of Kimbell and Stables' published work can be found
3. Current research and evaluation study mentioned:
   • Dr. Hardy working with Kay Stables and Sarah Davis
   • Using Kimbell and Stables' work on assessing D&T capability as a pre and post intervention test
4. Previous episodes in the assessment mini-series:
   • Episode 1: Overview of assessment in D&T
   • Episode 2: Assessing knowledge
   • Episode 3: Formative assessment, design crit and peer assessment

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Formative assessment in Design and Technology requires structured peer feedback approaches to be effective. Research shows a significant gap in assessing technological knowledge, with most studies focusing on design knowledge instead.

• Design crits from higher education can be adapted for classroom use through peer feedback
• Research from the Netherlands identifies convergent feedback (clarifying ideas) and divergent feedback (promoting creative responses)
• Teachers must model feedback techniques and provide clear criteria for students
• Effective sentence starters include "I notice your design solves the problem by..." and "Have you considered how your design might work if..."
• Using exemplars (WAGOLL) can limit creativity if not implemented carefully
• Structured peer feedback reduces teacher workload while ensuring all students receive input
• Andrew Halliwell is conducting new research on formative feedback to be presented in July 2025

Resources and References from Episode 3: Beyond the Design Crit: How Students Learn Through Giving and Receiving Feedback

1. Research from the Netherlands on peer feedback in D&T education
   • Research focused on effective convergent and divergent feedback techniques
   • Research addressing how pupils struggle with receiving and giving useful feedback
2. Nuffield Key Stage 3 materials with sentence structures for convergent and divergent questions
   • Available on the D&T for D&T website
3. Chapter by Alice Shutt in the "Debates in Design and Technology" book about the Netherlands research 

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

How do we effectively assess knowledge in Design and Technology education? It's a question with surprisingly few research-backed answers, despite its critical importance to teaching practice.

I talk about  this assessment gap in the second episode of my sub-series on D&T research. I remind listeners that D&T knowledge encompasses both conceptual understanding ("knowing what") and procedural application ("knowing how"), forming the foundation upon which capability is built.

The limited existing research highlights two common assessment approaches: identifying technological objects and materials with justification, and describing product functions while understanding the relationship between form and function. I illustrate this with a propelling pencil example, demonstrating how students need vocabulary to articulate the tension between physical characteristics and functional requirements.

Teacher expertise emerges as perhaps the most crucial factor in effective knowledge assessment. Research clearly shows that teachers must possess secure subject content knowledge to design meaningful tests—a challenge in today's educational landscape with fewer specialist D&T teachers. I extend this requirement beyond content knowledge to include pedagogical understanding of assessment methodologies and curricular knowledge about D&T's structure.

For classroom application, I explain that formative assessment can be integrated within larger assessments as targeted checkpoints, allowing teachers to identify misconceptions efficiently. Interestingly, research reveals no particular assessment format (multiple-choice, essays, flowcharts) proves superior to others—what matters most is purposeful design aligned with learning goals.

Considering your own teaching practice, how might targeted knowledge assessments enhance your students' overall learning? The limited research presents an opportunity for practitioners to contribute to our collective understanding. Share your effective assessment strategies and join the conversation about balancing knowledge assessment with capability development in D&T education.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

How do we measure what truly matters in Design and Technology education? The challenge lies in distinguishing between assessing individual knowledge components and evaluating the holistic capability that emerges when students apply their learning autonomously.

In this foundational episode, I introduce a new mini-series focused entirely on assessment in D&T education. Drawing from research literature, I establish the critical difference between two assessment targets: specific knowledge components (which can be tested through formative methods) and overall D&T capability (which requires summative, holistic evaluation). For assessment to serve its purpose effectively, it must be both reliable (consistently marked) and valid (measuring what we think it's measuring).

The complexities of D&T assessment stem from its unique nature - we're not just testing what students know, but also what they can do. This incorporates both conceptual understanding and procedural skills across a spectrum of design and technological knowledge. When students respond to design contexts, they independently choose which aspects of their knowledge and experience to apply, making predetermined assessment criteria challenging.

This episode sets the stage for deeper explorations in upcoming instalments, where I'll examine research-based approaches to assessing design knowledge, implementing effective formative assessment through peer feedback and design critiques, and developing valid measures of D&T capability. Whether you teach in primary or secondary settings, these insights will help you reflect on whether your current assessment practices truly capture what you intend them to measure.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

What makes for effective teaching in Design & Technology? Returning after a brief hiatus, I delve into the research-backed pedagogical approaches that can transform D&T education. This episode synthesizes my recent exploration of teaching strategies, clarifying the crucial distinction between curriculum (what we teach) and pedagogy (how we develop student capabilities).

At the heart of D&T education lies a persistent misconception I'm determined to challenge: there is no single, correct design process. Drawing on extensive research, I outline four foundational pedagogical approaches: the traditional design-and-make activity, mainly designing (where imagination isn't limited by technical constraints), mainly making (focused on skill development), and exploring technology in society. Throughout these approaches, teachers must navigate the spectrum between restrictive and expansive teaching choices, deciding when to provide structure and when to foster independent thinking.

Recording and documenting the design journey presents another pedagogical decision point. Are traditional booklets limiting student creativity? Could engineer's notebooks, digital portfolios, or multimedia approaches offer more authentic documentation? I examine how deliberate choices about design recording can either restrict or enhance student learning. This episode provides practical guidance for D&T educators committed to moving beyond ritualistic approaches while preparing for my upcoming episode on assessment strategies. 

Links, References and Resources Mentioned

1. Kay Stables' chapter on signature pedagogies: You can find her chapter titled "Signature Pedagogies for Designing: A Speculative Framework for Supporting Learning and Teaching in Design and Technology Education" on SpringerLink.
2. Matt McLain's research on expansive and restrictive approaches in design and technology education: His work on this topic can be found in his thesis on the Liverpool John Moores University repository and in the International Journal of Technology and Design Education.
3. Design fiction as a methodology for designing in unfamiliar contexts: You can explore this methodology in the DRS Digital Library and the Nordes conference proceedings.
4. The Young Foresight Project (early 2000s): Information about this project is available on SpringerLink.
5. Todd Kelly's work on the engineer's notebook as a design assessment tool: His work is detailed in an article on Purdue University's website and on ERIC.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of the Talking D&T podcast, I explore the pedagogical approach of product analysis, often known as IDEAS (Investigation, Disassembly, Evaluation, and Analysis). I examine how this signature pedagogy helps develop learners' understanding of technology in society—a core aim of the National Curriculum in England.

I discuss how product analysis bridges curriculum and pedagogy by teaching pupils to examine artefacts through multiple lenses. When handled thoughtfully, this approach enables young people to develop technological knowledge by understanding not just how products function, but why certain materials, components and manufacturing processes were selected.

My conversation highlights two particularly valuable aspects of product analysis:

Firstly, how physical interaction with products—handling a hair clip or observing people using a door—provides unique insights into design decisions and functionality that theoretical discussion alone cannot achieve.

Secondly, how examining products helps pupils recognise technological determinism—the reciprocal relationship between how technology shapes society and how society shapes technology.

Whether you're teaching primary or secondary D&T, this pedagogical approach offers rich opportunities to develop critical thinking and analytical skills. Consider how you might structure IDEAS activities with clear learning intentions: Are you focusing on materials selection, product evolution over time, or user experience?

Have you found effective ways to structure product analysis in your classroom? What impact have these approaches had on your pupils' design thinking and technological understanding? I'd love to hear your experiences.

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode, I delve into the pedagogical approaches that exist beyond the traditional 'design and make' activities in Design and Technology education. Drawing on research literature and classroom practice, I explore how 'mainly designing' and 'mainly making' activities can be powerful pedagogical tools when used deliberately and appropriately.

I share insights from Bill Nichol's work on designing for future contexts, including how case studies and question cards can help pupils develop empathy and understanding for users they cannot directly access. I also examine Hilda Ruth Beaumont's contributions to the Young Foresight Project, which demonstrated how pupils can design with materials not yet available in classrooms.

The episode highlights how these approaches allow pupils to explore unfamiliar contexts—whether from different countries, time periods, or future scenarios—without being constrained by their current making skills. I discuss how focused practical tasks provide opportunities for pupils to develop material understanding and manufacturing skills without the cognitive overload that can accompany full design and make activities.

These pedagogical approaches aren't replacements for design and make activities but complementary strategies that enhance pupils' learning. By recognising when we're using 'mainly designing' or 'mainly making' approaches (rather than masquerading them as design and make activities), we can better structure learning experiences that build capability.

How might your curriculum benefit from explicitly planning for 'mainly designing' and 'mainly making' activities? Could these approaches help you introduce pupils to emerging technologies or contexts beyond their immediate experience? Share your thoughts with colleagues and join the conversation about expanding our pedagogical repertoire in D&T education.

References, activities, and resources mentioned:

1. Donna Trebell's doctoral studies on "designing without making"
2. Young Foresight Project (late 1990s) - introducing children to new materials and processes not available in classrooms
3. Bill Nichol's work on question cards for exploring different users
4. "Designing Our Tomorrows" research by Bill Nichol, including hands-on kit
5. Bob McCormick's paper on "the ritual of the design project"
6. Matt McLain's and Sarah Davies' collaborative work with me on "mainly designing" and "mainly making" terminology
7. Nuffield resources for focused practical tasks (available on "dandtfordant" website)
8. IDEO cards (mentioned in context of exploring different functions and uses of objects)

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborati

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I explore the complex nature of design and make activities in design and technology education. Drawing on research from Richard Kimball, David Perry, and Robert McCormick, I unpack the pedagogical approach of design and make that underpins our subject and challenge some common misconceptions about "the design process".

A key insight emerges around the balance between process and outcome in D&T education. When we become fixated on the final product, we risk compromising valuable learning opportunities along the way. I examine Matt McLain's framework of expansive versus restrictive approaches, questioning when it's appropriate to give pupils freedom to make decisions and when more structured guidance serves them better.

I also explore McCormick's notion of 'revelation and ritual' in design processes, highlighting the danger of following steps mechanistically without making learning explicit to pupils. This raises important considerations about how we develop pupils' design and technology capability rather than simply guiding them through predetermined steps.

For D&T teachers, this episode offers a chance to reflect on your own practice. How do you balance the focus on outcomes with the development of skills and knowledge? Where in your projects do pupils have genuine opportunities to make decisions, experience failure, and justify their choices?

Whether you're teaching in a primary or secondary setting, these considerations are crucial for developing authentic design and technology capability in your pupils. How might you adapt your planning to create a more balanced approach to design and make activities in your classroom?

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Drawing a clear line between how we teach and what we teach seems straightforward—until you step into a Design & Technology classroom. In this thought-provoking exploration of pedagogy in D&T education, I unpack why teachers often blur the boundaries between teaching methods and curriculum content, sometimes without realising it.

The heart of effective D&T education lies in developing students' design and technology capability, but this requires navigating complex terrain. When we structure lessons around design processes without explicitly highlighting those processes as strategies students can adopt independently, we risk creating what researcher Bob McCormick calls "the ritual of the design project." Students follow prescribed steps without developing true capability—they complete the activities without gaining the metacognitive awareness needed to transfer these approaches to new contexts.

Through practical examples like the 6-3-5 collaborative design technique and tool demonstrations, I illustrate the difference between clear pedagogical separation (when demonstrating cutting techniques) and problematic blending (when teaching design processes). This distinction matters profoundly: when students don't recognise a design strategy as a transferable tool they can apply independently, their development as designers is limited. They become dependent on teacher-led frameworks rather than developing autonomous design thinking.

For D&T educators, this episode offers an opportunity to reflect on your teaching practice. Are you explicitly highlighting design strategies as transferable tools? Do your students recognise when they're learning processes they can apply independently? How might restructuring your lessons enhance students' ability to develop genuine capability rather than just following teacher-led frameworks?

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Mentioned in the show

1. Andrew Pollard's text about pedagogy - the reflective teaching book
2. Bob McCormick's paper about "the ritual of the design project"
3. Reference to Non-examined assessment (NEA) - coursework in England
4. Matt McClain's work on demonstrations as a teaching approach
5. The 6-3-5 technique of designing (design strategy where students fold A3 paper into six boxes and take turns creating designs in three-minute intervals)

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Knowledge frameworks matter profoundly in Design and Technology education, yet teachers often struggle to distinguish between what students need to know for a specific project versus what builds lasting capability. This episode tackles that challenge head-on.

In this episode, I explore the concept of knowledge frameworks in design and technology education, continuing my series on what research tells us about D&T. I delve into two types of knowledge that I believe are particularly relevant to our subject: residual knowledge and fingertip/situated knowledge.

Drawing from Christine Counsell's work in history education, I explain how these frameworks can help D&T teachers distinguish between knowledge that serves an immediate design context and knowledge that builds lasting capability. Using a biodiversity garden project as an example, I illustrate how certain knowledge (like specific materials properties) serves the immediate task, while other understanding contributes to transferable skills students carry forward.

This distinction is crucial for curriculum planning. When teaching about materials like chicken wire or bamboo, facts about cutting techniques might be context-specific, but understanding material selection represents residual knowledge that contributes to enduring D&T capability. This framework helps teachers make intentional decisions about what deserves emphasis and retrieval practice.

I also explore the importance of authentic contexts, warning against tokenistic project scenarios while emphasising that engagement remains crucial for effective learning. D&T educators must draw on their understanding of local environments and student interests, adapting resources to create meaningful learning experiences.

For teachers developing units of work, this episode offers both theoretical clarity and practical guidance to navigate the tension between project-based learning and building transferable knowledge. How might this framework transform your approach to curriculum planning and help you build students' D&T capability more effectively? 

Links and Resources Mentioned

1. Christine Counsell's work on residual knowledge and fingertip knowledge in history education
2. McCormick's 2004 paper on situated knowledge in design contexts
3. Kay Stables' work on authentic contexts in D&T education
4. Unit of work about biodiversity in school gardens created by Alison Hardy and Sarah Davies
5. Ofsted research reviews published on their website

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I explore the complex role of values in design and technology education. Drawing on research from influential scholars like David Layton, Mike Martin and Rhoda Trimingham, I unpack how values aren't merely peripheral to D&T but are, as Layton puts it, "the engine of design and technology."

I examine two key perspectives: values within design (how values influence design decisions) and values developed through design and technology (how students develop values as they become technologically literate). Particularly fascinating is Trimingham's research observing designers in practice, revealing how both internal and external values shape design decisions, often unconsciously.

We explore how early curriculum frameworks categorised values as technical, economic, aesthetic, and moral—frameworks that remain relevant despite their absence from the current National Curriculum. This raises important questions about how we as educators bring our own value systems into our teaching, potentially modelling these unconsciously to our pupils.

For D&T teachers, this episode offers an opportunity to reflect on how we might make values more explicit in our teaching, helping pupils understand not just how to design, but how their values influence those designs. Whether you're teaching in England or internationally, considering the role of values adds depth to design education and helps students develop critical awareness of design decisions.

How might you bring conversations about values more explicitly into your D&T classroom? Could examining values help your students make more thoughtful design decisions? Let's continue this important dialogue with colleagues about preserving these vital aspects of our subject.

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode, I delve deeper into the forms of knowledge that underpin design and technology education. Building on McCormick's conceptual and procedural knowledge framework, I propose a more nuanced approach that considers design knowledge and technological knowledge as existing on a spectrum.

I explore how these knowledge types can be visualised as intersecting axes, creating four quadrants that help teachers plan their curriculum more effectively. This framework isn't meant for pupils but serves as a planning tool for teachers to develop knowledge systematically over time.

Drawing on Vincenti's work on engineering knowledge, I highlight the importance of design criteria and design instrumentalities – the tools and procedures used when designing. These elements are crucial for pupils to build their repertoire of skills and understanding as outlined in the National Curriculum.

The reality of diminishing teaching time for D&T presents significant challenges for delivering the curriculum comprehensively. This framework offers a way to make informed decisions about what to include and exclude whilst ensuring pupils' design and technology capability continues to develop.

How might you use this knowledge framework to review your current planning? Could mapping your curriculum against these knowledge types reveal gaps or opportunities for deeper learning? Join the conversation and share your thoughts on how we might better structure D&T knowledge in our teaching.

Look out for the next episode where I'll be discussing the often-overlooked but central role of values in design and technology education.

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode, I explore what research tells us about knowledge in Design & Technology education. Understanding the nature of knowledge in D&T is crucial for effective teaching and curriculum planning, so I examine both procedural and conceptual knowledge, exploring how they connect and what this means for our practice.

Following our previous discussion on D&T capability, I analyse the relationship between these knowledge types, drawing from Bob McCormick's 1997 paper and wider literature. Through examples from textiles and materials, I demonstrate how procedural knowledge extends beyond following steps to understanding interconnected processes. Looking at tasks like using a sewing machine, I discuss how teachers can build pupils' procedural knowledge over time, helping them develop both technical competence and the ability to select appropriate processes.

I challenge some common approaches to teaching theory and discuss how conceptual knowledge encompasses categories and relationships rather than just facts. Using examples from my teaching - including a memorable lesson about bronze - I consider how we might better structure our teaching of materials and their properties.

For D&T teachers, this discussion offers insights for curriculum planning and sequencing. Whether you're developing schemes of work or considering progression, these ideas could reshape how you approach building pupils' knowledge and capability.

What's your take on knowledge in D&T? How do you balance procedural and conceptual understanding in your teaching?

• Examining the importance of knowledge in D&T education 
• Differentiating between procedural and conceptual knowledge 
• Discussing the interconnected nature of different teaching procedures 
• Highlighting the role of literature in shaping understanding 
• Challenging traditional views on skills vs knowledge in D&T 
• Illustrating practical examples of knowledge in action 
• Reflecting on the implications for effective curriculum planning

Mentioned in the show

Hurrell, D., 2021. Conceptual knowledge or procedural knowledge or conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge: Why the conjunction is important to teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 46 (2), 57–71.

McCormick, R., 1997. Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7 (1), 141–159.

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on my research, thinking and direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode, I delve into the fundamental purpose of the design and technology curriculum, focusing on the concept of D&T capability. Drawing from seminal research by Richard Kimball and Kay Stables, I explore how this capability encompasses creative and critical thinking, problem-solving, and solution creation within authentic contexts.

I unpack how D&T capability isn't something that simply emerges through teaching knowledge and practical skills – it requires careful, structured curriculum planning. The episode highlights two particularly fascinating aspects: the role of iterative design (which, contrary to popular belief, isn't a new concept from the 2013 National Curriculum), and the importance of authentic learning contexts that can extend into unknown future scenarios.

For D&T teachers, this episode offers valuable insights into curriculum planning that deliberately develops pupils' capacity for creative and critical thinking over time. Whether you're teaching in primary or secondary, you'll find practical considerations for building what I call pupils' 'growing toolbox' of technical skills, strategic thinking, and designerly strategies.

This exploration of D&T capability is particularly relevant as schools continue to shape their curriculum intent. How do you structure your curriculum to develop these capabilities? Are you planning for progression from Year 1 through to GCSE and beyond?

Connect with me through Speakpipe or email to share your thoughts on developing D&T capability in your context. Links are in the show notes, and if you find the podcast valuable, consider becoming a patron to support this work.

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode, I'm sharing some exciting developments in design and technology education, starting with insights from a recent policy event I led at Nottingham Trent University. The day brought together D&T teachers and university lecturers in design education to envision the future of our subject, using an innovative co-navigator approach from Denmark.

I discuss the growing collaboration between schools and universities in design education, highlighted by lightning talks from key figures including Tony Ryan from the D&T Association and Michelle Gregson from the National Society for Education in Art and Design. The event demonstrated how breaking down barriers between educational sectors can enrich our understanding of design education's progression from primary through to higher education.

Looking ahead, I preview an upcoming series about pedagogy in D&T, where we'll be taking a fresh look at familiar teaching approaches like demonstrations, WAGGOLLs, and frameworks such as ACCESS FM. Working with Sarah Davies and Alice Hellard, we'll be exploring what research tells us about these techniques and how we might enhance their use in our classrooms.

For those interested in connecting with other D&T practitioners, I introduce the Archer Exchange Network, a new platform for sharing ideas and research in our field. 

As you reflect on your own teaching approaches, what aspects of D&T pedagogy would you like to examine more deeply? Whether you're teaching in the UK or internationally, I'd love to hear your thoughts on how we can build stronger connections between research and classroom practice.

Subscribe to stay updated on these discussions and join our growing community of design educators.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this reflective end-of-year episode, I take stock of Talking D&T's journey through 2024 and share plans for the future. With 52 episodes published this year - including 27 interviews spanning two major series, PATT40 and Shaping D&T - it's been my most prolific year yet, reaching listeners through nearly 8,000 downloads.

I reflect on how the podcast has evolved from its origins as a way to make design and technology research more accessible to teachers, into a platform for, what I hope is, meaningful dialogue about D&T education. The conversations this year have ranged from classroom experiences to curriculum development, featuring voices from across the D&T community - from undergraduate students to international colleagues.

A golden thread throughout has been the value of teacher-led research and curriculum development, highlighted through our Redesigning D&T project interviews. The podcast has also opened up important discussions about the future of D&T education, bringing policy-level conversations directly to practitioners through the Shaping D&T series.

For those interested in supporting the podcast's continued development, I discuss the various ways to engage, from subscribing to sharing feedback. This collaborative approach helps ensure the podcast remains an independent voice for the D&T community while covering its modest running costs.

As we look toward 2025, how might you contribute to these ongoing conversations about D&T education? What topics would you like to explore in future episodes?

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I chat with Simone Norman, a D&T teacher at Sutton High School in South London who also leads on equality, diversity and inclusion. Our conversation examines a fascinating paper from the PAT40 conference about conversation analysis and variation theory in technical education, which particularly resonated with Simone's teaching experience.

We explore how teachers plan and deliver technical demonstrations, examining the intricate interplay between verbal and non-verbal communication in the workshop. Simone shares compelling insights about the evolution of student-teacher conversations, from directing year 7 pupils to engaging in collaborative dialogue with year 13s about their design decisions.

One particularly fascinating thread emerges around the role of sensory learning in D&T - how sound, smell, and touch become crucial indicators of process success or failure. We discuss how teachers can deliberately plan for and use these elements in their demonstrations to deepen student understanding.

For D&T educators, this episode offers fresh perspectives on teaching technical processes and skills. Consider how you might more explicitly incorporate sensory awareness into your demonstrations, or how you could use planned 'failures' as powerful teaching moments. The discussion challenges us to think beyond just the end product and consider the rich learning opportunities within the technical processes themselves.

Whether you're teaching in England or following D&T education developments internationally, this conversation prompts important questions about pedagogical approaches in our subject. How might you apply conversation analysis principles to enhance your technical demonstrations? Let's continue exploring these ideas together!


Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this reflective episode of Talking D&T, I explore the key themes and insights that emerged from my 26-part series on shaping design and technology education. Drawing from my conversations with educators, researchers, and industry experts throughout 2024, I examine the ongoing debate between evolution versus revolution in D&T education.

One fascinating thread running through many of my discussions was the crucial role of teacher voice in curriculum development. From my conversations with Amanda Mason and Ciaran Ellis about the Redesigning D&T project to discussions with international colleagues about different approaches worldwide, it's clear that teachers must be at the heart of shaping the subject's future.

I examine how the shift from local authority support to multi-academy trusts has transformed teacher collaboration and professional development. This transition raises important questions about how we support and empower D&T teachers to conduct research, share insights, and contribute to the subject's development.

For D&T educators, this episode offers a chance to reflect on the broader conversations shaping our subject. Whether you're teaching in a primary classroom or leading a department, these discussions about curriculum evolution, assessment methods, and the balance between traditional skills and new technologies directly impact your practice.

As I look ahead, I encourage you to consider your role in shaping D&T education. How might you contribute to these ongoing discussions within your own setting? What changes would you like to see in the subject, and how can we work together to achieve them?

I'd love to hear your thoughts on how we can collectively strengthen D&T education while maintaining its core purpose of developing creative, technical, and practical expertise in our learners.

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode, I'm joined by Michele Gregson, General Secretary and Chief Executive of the National Society for Education in Art and Design (NSEAD). With over 30 years of experience across education, Michele brings valuable insights into the relationship between art & design and design & technology education.

We explore the complex interplay between these two subjects, discussing both the common ground and distinctive characteristics that make each unique. Our conversation delves into how curriculum pressures and resource constraints are reshaping both subjects, sometimes leading to what Michele thoughtfully describes as 'blurring' rather than meaningful collaboration.

Two particularly fascinating threads emerge: firstly, the concept of a 'spectrum of practice' that spans from purely artistic self-expression to tightly constrained technical design, and secondly, the nature of creativity across both subjects. Michele challenges traditional assumptions about where creativity resides in the curriculum, prompting important questions about how we conceptualise and teach creative practices.

For D&T educators, this discussion offers fresh perspectives on curriculum planning and subject identity. Consider how you might articulate the distinctive value of D&T while acknowledging productive overlaps with art & design. What opportunities exist in your setting for meaningful collaboration that enhances rather than diminishes subject integrity?

This conversation comes at a crucial time as we shape the future of design education. How might we maintain subject distinctiveness while fostering genuine cross-disciplinary learning? Share your thoughts and experiences - let's continue this vital dialogue about preserving and evolving our subjects for today's learners.

Let me know what resonates with your experience - I'd love to hear your perspective on this ongoing conversation about subject identity and integrity.

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of the Talking D&T podcast, I describe the recent curriculum and assessment review panel meeting I attended in Cambridgeshire. I explore the ongoing call for evidence and its implications for design and technology education.

One key insight from the meeting was the emphasis on evolution, not revolution, in curriculum changes. This approach considers the financial constraints and the current strain on the teaching workforce. Another significant point was the focus on social justice, highlighting the need to address barriers faced by disadvantaged students and those with special educational needs.

We also discussed the potential impact of making the national curriculum mandatory for all schools, including academies. This could standardise educational aims and content, ensuring a more cohesive approach across the country.

For D&T teachers, this episode offers valuable reflections on how these changes might affect your practice. Consider how you can contribute to the call for evidence by identifying specific pinch points in the curriculum that impact your students. Reflect on what works well in your teaching and what could be improved, and think about how these insights can inform your responses.

Listeners, especially those in the UK, will find this episode particularly relevant, but I encourage our international audience to tune in as well. The themes of equity and effective curriculum design are universal.

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

• Event for those involved in teaching design and technology in primary and secondary schools (6th November). Registration closes on 4th November.
• TeacherTapp
• Podcast Episodes mentioned:
  • Interview with Michelle Gregson, General Secretary from NSEAD.
  • Previous episode with Tony Ryan discussing the place of design and technology in the curriculum.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode, I chat with Kevin Spurr and Becky Forshaw from Kitronik, a company supplying D&T resources to schools. Kevin, a co-founder with 20 years of experience, and Becky, a former primary teacher, offer unique perspectives on the evolving landscape of D&T education.

We explore how Kitronik develops products and resources balancing engagement, affordability, and curriculum relevance. Kevin shares insights into their manufacturing process and adapting to changing technologies, while Becky discusses creating flexible teacher resources.

We discuss the shift in electronics teaching in secondary schools and Kitronik's new 'Crafting Code' project for primary schools, blending coding with hands-on making.

This conversation highlights the interplay between curriculum, resources, and teacher expertise in shaping D&T education. It raises questions about supporting teachers' subject knowledge and adapting to technological changes while maintaining D&T's essence.

For educators, this episode offers insights on resource selection, curriculum planning, and professional development. How might you balance practical skills with conceptual understanding? How can we ensure D&T remains relevant and engaging for all students?

Connect with Kitronik

• Social media: @kitronik (X, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok)
• Website: www.kitronik.co.uk

Products and resources mentioned:

1. Craft and Code (pre-launch info) 
2. Drag Racer: Product
3. Drag Racer: Resources
4. Electro-Fashion resources

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I break down the curriculum and assessment review for England. As a researcher in design and technology education, I highlight key sections relevant to D&T teachers and stakeholders.

I walk you through the review's nine sections, focusing on areas like social justice, curriculum content, and assessment. You'll learn how to approach your response and understand the importance of providing specific examples.

We explore D&T's place in the curriculum and discuss maintaining a broad, balanced offering in schools. I share thoughts on addressing the decline in D&T uptake and the need for creative subjects.

This episode is useful for D&T teachers in England, but international listeners will find value in understanding curriculum reviews. I provide advice on crafting your response and invite you to a 6th November online event.

How might your perspective shape D&T education? Let's ensure our subject's vital role is recognised!

Mentioned in the show
1. Curriculum and assessment review call for evidence document
2. EPI report commissioned by the Design and Technology Association
3. "Debates in Design and Technology Education" book
4. Previous podcast episode on empathy in design and technology
5. Paper by Alison Hardy on the impact of Progress 8 on children's access to design and technology post-14
6. Online event on 6th November at 4:00 PM GMT to discuss the curriculum review response

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I'm delighted to chat with Venessa Lourdes Silveira, a PhD student in Educational Theory and Practice with a fascinating background in design and technology education. We dive into Venessa's action research project on promoting creativity in secondary D&T classrooms through biomimicry.

Our conversation explores how nature-inspired design methods can spark student engagement and innovative thinking. Venessa shares insights from her collaborative work with classroom teacher Paul Maburu, revealing how outdoor learning experiences and carefully crafted prompts can transform students' design processes.

We discuss the challenges and rewards of implementing biomimicry in D&T lessons, touching on its potential to address wider issues like climate change and mental health in education. Venessa's approach offers a fresh perspective on moving beyond design fixation and embracing local knowledge and resources.

For D&T educators, this episode provides practical strategies for incorporating biomimicry into your teaching practice. We consider how cross-curricular collaboration, particularly with science colleagues, can enrich design projects and deepen students' understanding of the natural world.

Whether you're teaching in the UK or internationally, Venessa's research offers valuable insights into fostering creativity and environmental awareness through D&T. As you listen, consider how you might adapt these ideas to your own classroom context.

How might biomimicry reshape your approach to design challenges? Share your thoughts with colleagues and join the conversation about the future of D&T education.

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I chat with Alice Hellard, Programme Lead for Design and Technology PGCE at Goldsmiths University, and Derek Jones, senior lecturer in sustainable design at the Open University. We talk about design studios and their potential impact on D&T education.

Our conversation explores how studio practices can shape learning experiences, from primary classrooms to higher education. Alice shares insights from her teaching background, while Derek offers a unique perspective on virtual studios and they both discuss extended cognition in design.

We tackle some a range of topics, including the challenges of assessment in D&T, the importance of dialogue in the design process, and how to foster a studio mindset in secondary schools. One key takeaway is the value of creating spaces where students can experiment without predetermined outcomes – a concept that might seem daunting but could revolutionise some teachers' approach to D&T education.

As we discuss the various types of knowledge in design, from explicit facts to tacit understanding, I reflect of the complexity of our subject. This episode will challenge you to reflect on your own teaching practices and consider how elements of design studio pedagogy might enhance your students' learning experiences.

Details about Alice and Derek
Alice on Linkedin 

Goldsmiths

Email: derek.jones@open.ac.uk

Derek on LinkedIn

Distance Design Education website 

Derek's academic publications 

Design Research Society Pedagogy SIG

Radzikowska, M., Ruecker, S., & Roberst-Smith, J. (2019). Forget to Clean-Up When You’re Done. Proceedings of DRS Learn X Design 2019, 361–374. https://doi.org/10.21606/learnxdesign.2019.09071

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, inf

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Curious about how exam boards shape design and technology education? In this episode of Talking D&T, I sit down with Louise Attwood, Subject Support Lead for D&T at AQA. With eight years at the exam board and a background in teaching, Louise offers unique insights into the world of D&T qualifications.

We explore the intricate process of curriculum development and assessment, uncovering how AQA works with the Department for Education, Ofqual, and teachers to shape D&T education. Louise reveals the challenges of balancing content breadth with depth, and how recent reforms have impacted the subject.

A key takeaway is the importance of teacher involvement in qualification development. Louise shares multiple avenues for educators to contribute, from focus groups to feedback forms. We also discuss the delicate balance between political agendas and educational needs in curriculum design.

For D&T teachers in England and beyond, this episode offers valuable understanding of the forces shaping our subject. As you listen, consider how you might engage more actively in these processes. How could your experiences inform future curriculum changes?

Whether you're crafting lessons or influencing policy, this conversation will enrich your perspective on D&T education. Share your thoughts with colleagues and consider reaching out to exam boards or Ofqual with your insights.

Let's keep this important dialogue going! How will you contribute to shaping the future of D&T education?

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

1. AQA
2. Department for Education (DfE) 
3. Ofqual (Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation) 
4. Link to register interest in discussing the future of AQA D&T specifications
5. AQA Professional Development page
6. Government launch

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I chat with Dawn Foxall, founder of the Textile Skills Centre. Dawn's fascinating journey from knitwear designer to opera singer, and finally to textiles education advocate, sets the stage for our wide-ranging conversation.

We delve into the current state of textiles education within D&T, exploring the challenges faced by teachers and the need for a more comprehensive approach. Dawn shares insights from her recent research, revealing surprising findings about teachers' preferences for textiles within D&T versus art and design.

One key takeaway is the importance of broadening our perception of textiles beyond fashion. We discuss how textiles intersect with various industries, from automotive to medical, highlighting the subject's relevance and potential to engage a diverse range of students.

The conversation also touches on the crucial role of assessment and curriculum design in shaping D&T education. We consider how exam boards and chief examiners influence the subject's direction and discuss the need for more up-to-date, relevant content in specifications.

For D&T teachers, this episode offers food for thought on how to present textiles as a versatile, technology-driven field. Consider how you might incorporate examples from diverse industries to showcase the breadth of textiles applications. How can we collectively work to ensure that textiles remains a vital part of D&T education? Let's keep this important dialogue going!

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I chat with Dr Bethan Gordon, Dean of Cardiff School of Art and Design at Cardiff Metropolitan University. Bethan, a human-centred designer by training, has been deeply involved in developing the new curriculum for Wales.

We dive into the fascinating world of curriculum reform, exploring how Wales is revolutionising its approach to education. Bethan shares insights on their focus on developing both the curriculum and the teachers themselves, introducing the concept of 'teachers as inquirers'.

Two key points really caught my attention: firstly, the emphasis on empowering teachers to critically examine their practice and make evidence-informed decisions. Secondly, the integration of design thinking into the science and technology area of learning, while also promoting creativity and problem-solving across all subjects.

For D&T teachers, this episode offers a treasure trove of ideas to reflect on. How might an inquiry-based approach enhance your teaching? Could the Welsh model of positioning D&T skills across the curriculum offer fresh perspectives for your school?

Whether you're teaching in England, Wales, or further afield, there's plenty here to ponder and discuss with colleagues. It's intriguing to see how different education systems are evolving, and I'm keen to hear your thoughts on how these ideas might shape the future of D&T education.

This conversation with Bethan certainly gave me food for thought about curriculum development and teacher empowerment. What aspects resonate with your experience? Let's keep this important dialogue going!

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, informative, and engaging content to complement each episode.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I had the pleasure of interviewing Scott Bartholemew, a professor of technology and engineering studies at Brigham Young University in Utah, USA. We explored the landscape of design and technology education in America, which is known there as technology and engineering education.

Scott provided fascinating insights into the complex structure of technology education in the US, explaining how it varies significantly between states. He described the historical split between generalist technology education and career-focused technical education, represented by two main organisations: ITEEA and ACTE.

We discussed how the subject is taught at different levels, with a focus on broad exposure to various technologies in middle schools. Scott also highlighted an interesting development where school librarians have unexpectedly become key technology educators in primary schools.

A significant challenge Scott mentioned is the public's lack of understanding about what technology and engineering education entails. This often leads to oversimplification when explaining the subject.

Throughout our conversation, we drew parallels between the American system and the British D&T curriculum, noting both similarities and differences. It was refreshing to learn that despite the different terminology and structures, we face many similar challenges in promoting and developing our subject.

Overall, this international perspective provided valuable insights into how design and technology education is approached in another part of the world.
(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I dive into the recently announced curriculum review for England and what it means for design and technology education. As someone who's been part of discussions shaping D&T's future, I share my thoughts on how teachers can get involved and influence government policy.

I explore the review's terms of reference, highlighting the emphasis on a 'broader curriculum' and what this could mean for D&T. Drawing on my experience, I suggest focusing on D&T's unique contribution to a broad education, rather than generic skills development.

I discuss the potential challenges and opportunities this review presents, considering teacher workload, budget constraints, and the need for evolution rather than revolution in our subject. I offer practical advice for teachers wanting to make their voices heard, from engaging with school leaders to participating in initiatives like the Redesigning D&T project.

Throughout, I emphasise the importance of evidence-based arguments and the need to balance the essence of D&T with practical considerations. Whether you're a primary or secondary teacher, or simply passionate about D&T's future, this episode provides food for thought on how we can collectively shape our subject.

So, how will you contribute to this crucial conversation about D&T's place in the curriculum? Let's ensure our subject's voice is heard loud and clear in this review!

Links

1. Design Council Policy Document: A collaborative report outlining recommendations for design education, launched in June 2024.
2. Curriculum Review Terms of Reference: The government's outline for the review, focusing on core subjects and a broader curriculum.
3. Redesigning D&T Project: An initiative led by Ciaran Ellis, Amanda Mason, and Andy Halliwell to gather teachers' views on contentious questions in D&T.
4. Ofsted Curriculum Research Review for D&T: An upcoming publication expected to provide evidence on what makes D&T unique.
5. Archer Exchange Network: A soon-to-be-launched platform where experts from Nottingham Trent University will share insights on D&T policies and classroom practice.

Acknowledgement
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual content and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. 

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I chat with David Houston, team leader for schools and colleges at the V&A South Kensington. David shares his passion for design education and the pivotal role museums play in inspiring young minds.

We delve into the V&A's innovative programmes, including DesignLab Nation and V&A Innovate, which bring design thinking to schools across the UK. David's insights on creating 'eureka moments' for students and the importance of hands-on experiences with objects are particularly fascinating.

Our conversation explores how museums can complement classroom learning, offering fresh perspectives and igniting creativity. David's anecdotes about students finding their voice in museum settings are inspiring.

We discuss the challenges facing D&T education and how museums can support teachers in delivering rich, engaging content. The V&A's teacher twilight sessions and resources emerge as useful tools for professional development.

This episode offers ideas for D&T teachers looking to enhance their practice. Consider how you might incorporate museum visits or object-based learning into your teaching. Could you collaborate with local museums to create similar opportunities for your students?

As we reflect on the cultural, social, and democratic aspects of design education, I encourage you to think about how these ideas align with your own teaching philosophy.

How might you foster those 'gasping for air' moments of learning in your classroom?
How can we, as D&T educators, build stronger bridges between schools and cultural institutions to enrich our students' learning experiences?

Mentioned:

1. Schools and Colleges In-person workshops Autumn 2024 - Summer 2025 - Workshop at V&A South Kensington
2. Teachers' resources for primary schools
3. Teachers' resources for secondary schools & colleges
4. Teacher Twilights & Teacher Sanctuaries can be found on the V&A What’s On page. 
5. DesignLab Nation
6. V&A Innovate
7. You can find  V&A Innovate object in focus films on YouTube: 

Acknowledgement:
Some of the supplementary content for this podcast episode was crafted with the assistance of Claude, an AI language model developed by Anthropic. While the core content is based on the actual conversation and my editorial direction, Claude helped in refining and structuring information to best serve listeners. This collaborative approach allows me to provide you with concise, i

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I sit down with Amanda Mason and Ciaran Ellis to discuss their involvement in the Redesigning D&T project. We explore their motivations for joining the initiative and the valuable insights they've gained along the way.

Amanda, a secondary school teacher in the Northeast of England, shares how the project has deepened her understanding of the subject and its varied interpretations across schools. Ciaran, head of design technology in the Northwest, describes it as the best CPD he's ever had, empowering him to engage more confidently in academic discussions about the subject.

We examine the benefits of teachers participating in curriculum research, from personal growth to influencing policy. Both Amanda and Ciaran highlight the unexpected opportunities that have arisen from their involvement, including presenting at conferences and writing articles.

The conversation touches on the challenges of stimulating debate within the D&T community, particularly around contentious questions posed by the project. We discuss the importance of articulating our thinking about the subject, both within and outside the D&T community, to strengthen its profile and influence.

Finally, we consider why it's crucial for teachers to be involved in shaping the D&T curriculum through research. As Amanda aptly puts it, "Who's better informed about teaching design and technology than the teachers themselves?"

This episode offers a compelling look at how teachers can contribute to and benefit from curriculum research, potentially shaping the future of D&T education.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I sat down with Jim Dale, Head of Product Design at Nottingham Trent University, to explore the evolving landscape of design education. Jim shared fascinating insights into how university courses are adapting to prepare students for the diverse world of modern product design.

We delved into the transition students face when moving from school to university, discussing how Jim's department helps broaden their understanding of design beyond physical objects to include digital products, systems, and services. Jim emphasised the importance of creating an environment where students feel comfortable exploring ideas and even failing, which contrasts with the often high-pressure atmosphere in schools.

Our conversation took an unexpected turn as we explored the potential role of language skills, particularly poetry, in enhancing students' ability to use AI tools in design. This led to a broader discussion on the importance of communication skills for designers, including the ability to articulate ideas verbally and visually.

Jim also shared his thoughts on how design and technology education in schools could be improved, suggesting a greater focus on rewarding exploration and risk-taking, alongside maintaining core skills like drawing and making.

Throughout our chat, it became clear that design education is a complex and rapidly evolving field. Jim's perspectives offered valuable food for thought on how we can better prepare students for the multifaceted world of design, from school through to university and beyond.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I had the pleasure of interviewing Ryan Ball from the D&T Association. Our conversation centred around the current state of the design and technology teaching workforce in England. Ryan shared his insights from visiting numerous schools across the country, highlighting the enthusiasm of primary school teachers and the challenges faced by secondary school teachers.

We discussed the shift in demographics, with younger teachers bringing fresh ideas and skills in areas such as CAD and rapid prototyping. However, we also noted the increasing number of non-specialist teachers in D&T, which can impact the quality of teaching and the subject's perception. The D&T Association is addressing this issue by offering courses for non-specialist teachers and advocating for the subject with the government.

Ryan emphasised the importance of subject-specific CPD, adequate funding for resources, and support for teachers to maintain their passion and confidence in teaching D&T. We also touched upon the need for teachers to promote the subject effectively within their schools, considering the diverse needs of students in different locations.

Throughout our conversation, Ryan's enthusiasm for D&T shone through, and we both agreed that by working together as a community, we could continue to support teachers and promote the value of the subject. I left the interview feeling optimistic about the future of D&T education in England.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

D&T Association

House of Commons Evidence Select Committee Report, published in June 2023

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I spoke with Holly Maxwell, a curriculum advisor for the Leigh Academy Trust, and Harkit Janagel, head of design and food at Strood Academy, about the differences between GCSE Design & Technology and GCSE 3D Design. We delved into the challenges teachers face when choosing between these qualifications and the reasons why some schools opt for 3D Design over D&T.

Holly and Harkit shared their experiences and insights, discussing the emphasis on theoretical knowledge in the current D&T GCSE and how 3D Design allows students to focus more on practical skills and creativity. We also touched upon the importance of language in shaping the identity and perception of the subject, as well as the role of teachers' specialisms and backgrounds in influencing their approach to teaching.

Throughout the conversation, I challenged some of the assumptions and beliefs surrounding the two qualifications, questioning whether the end goal and purpose of D&T and 3D Design are fundamentally different. We also explored the content overload in the current D&T GCSE and the need for a more concept-driven approach that moves away from material-specific identities.

This engaging discussion highlighted the complexities and ongoing debates within the D&T community, as teachers strive to provide the best educational experiences for their students while navigating the constraints and expectations of the education system.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I interview Milly Kearns, a final year Product Design student at Nottingham Trent University. Milly shares her experiences studying Design and Technology (D&T) in school and how that led her to pursue product design at university. We discuss the differences and similarities between D&T at school versus university, including the focus on collaboration, presentation skills, and the application of theoretical knowledge.

Milly offers insightful advice for D&T teachers, suggesting they continue encouraging students to explore multiple ideas rather than fixating on their first concept. She also recommends moving away from the practice of cramming process documents with unnecessary information and instead focus on the quality and relevance of the content. Additionally, Milly advocates for more collaborative studio-style learning in D&T classrooms to better prepare students for real-world design practices.

We also touch upon Milly's dissertation research on creative education and her final project, which involves designing a system to support people diagnosed with arthritis through clay classes and holistic therapies. As the episode concludes, Milly shares her aspirations to become a D&T teacher and help shape the next generation of designers.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Mentioned in the podcast - detailed links are only available to subscribers

Nottingham Trent University's Product Design programme

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of the Talking D&T podcast, I interviewed Janine Pavlis, a lecturer at St Mary's University in Twickenham, London, who specialises in primary design and technology education. We discussed the current state of D&T in primary schools, including the statutory requirements, the typical structure of lessons, and the importance of creativity and problem-solving skills.

Janine shared examples of good practice she has observed, such as the integration of computing skills and the use of real-world problems. However, she also highlighted the challenges faced by primary school teachers, including the need for ongoing professional development, the lack of resources, and the pressure to buy into pre-made schemes of work.

We explored the importance of considering primary education when shaping the future of D&T and the need for more research on inclusive practices within the subject. Janine expressed her concern that primary school teachers are not being consulted enough when it comes to making decisions about the D&T curriculum.

Throughout our conversation, we emphasised the significance of aligning teaching with the values and aims of the subject, ensuring that children understand the purpose behind their learning. We also discussed the potential for further research into teachers' motivations and experiences in teaching D&T at the primary level.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of the Talking D&T podcast, I had the pleasure of interviewing Nicky Dewar, the Director of Learning and Skills at the Crafts Council. We discussed the importance of craft in design and technology education and the challenges faced by schools in incorporating hands-on making experiences for students.

Nicky shared her insights on how the craft element in both art and design and design technology has been slowly eroding over time. She emphasized the significance of engaging children and young people with materials, allowing them to understand how different materials react and how they can be used to tell stories or respond to challenges.

We also talked about the mental health benefits of craft and how it can help students feel calm and release feel-good hormones. Nicky highlighted the need for supporting teachers through specialist training and encouraging them to take advantage of the rich offerings available from organizations like the Crafts Council.

Throughout our conversation, Nicky stressed the importance of recognizing the value of craft in education and how it can make a significant difference in various aspects of life, from economic value to community well-being. She also shared details about the Crafts Council's initiatives, such as Craft School and Material World, which aim to inspire and support teachers in delivering engaging craft activities in their classrooms.

Links

• Craft School - a free programme for teachers which has CPD and resources around teaching craft in schools
• Instagram - @craftscouncil
• Material World - the current Craft School challenge in partnership with the Eden Project, focusing on sustainability and environmental responsibility (registration deadline for this year is February 14, 2024, but it will run again from September 2024 onwards)

Other links to things mentioned in the show are  only available to subscribers

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Early this year I had the pleasure of interviewing Tony Ryan, the Chief Executive of the Design and Technology Association. In this episode, Tony shared exciting updates about the association's initiatives to support and advance design and technology education in the UK.

We discussed the "Reimagined" program, which focuses on developing a design-driven, problem-solving approach to the subject at Key Stage 3. The association has created 12 units of work, with plans to release up to 30, inspired by real-world challenges provided by over 300 industry partners. These units aim to engage students in iterative design, CAD, and 3D printing while fostering essential skills like tenacity and collaboration.

Tony also highlighted the Association's efforts in primary education, with the popular "Projects on a Page" resources and plans to digitize them for interactive classroom use. We touched upon the lobbying efforts to ensure design and technology remains a valued subject in the curriculum and the need for evidence-based research to support these initiatives.

Throughout our conversation, Tony's passion for the subject and dedication to creating innovative, accessible resources shone through. I'm excited to see the impact these projects will have on students and teachers alike.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

From the Design and Technology Association

Re-imagining report

Inspired by Industry:  www.inspiredbyindustry.org.uk, including  the dinosaur unit (click on the 'promotional displays' button).

Projects on a Page is sold separately, it is better value  purchased with primary school membership

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I sit down with Dave Parry, Design and Technology Advisor at CLEAPSS, to discuss the current state of D&T education in England and explore potential ways to shape its future. Dave shares his insights from visiting numerous schools and highlights some of the main challenges the subject faces, including a shortage of trained staff, difficulties in recruiting and retaining teachers, and limited access to professional development opportunities.

We delve into the importance of fostering collaboration among stakeholders, such as awarding bodies, to create a shared understanding of the subject's goals and constraints. Dave emphasizes the need for teachers to embrace their agency and professionalism in designing engaging and relevant D&T curricula, while also considering sustainability and environmental issues.

Throughout our conversation, we explore practical strategies for reimagining D&T education, such as focusing on problem-solving rather than take-home projects, utilizing reusable materials and components, and leveraging community resources and partnerships. We also discuss the potential impact of the upcoming Ofsted subject review and the need for effective moderation in online teacher communities.

As we conclude our discussion, I invite listeners to engage with the ideas presented and share their thoughts on shaping the future of D&T education. Together, we can work towards a more collaborative, creative, and sustainable approach to teaching and learning in this vital subject area.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Links to things mentioned in the show are  only available to subscribers.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode, I interview  David Spendlove, a professor at the University of Manchester, about his radical thinking on design and technology education. Spendlove reintroduces his concept of "Design and Technology 2.0," which aims to create a new conceptual space for rethinking the subject without the baggage of its current form.

David argues that the current model of D&T education, driven by materialistic outcomes and consumerist ideologies, may be doing more harm than good in today's context of sustainability and climate change concerns. He suggests that D&T education should move away from its focus on product creation and instead empower students to question assumptions and engage with the complexity of values involved in design decisions.

The discussion delves into the political nature of D&T education, its historical context, and the challenges it faces in the current educational landscape. David emphasises the need for a critical examination of the subject's underlying ideologies and the importance of considering an "Earth-centred" approach rather than just focusing on human needs and wants.

The podcast concludes with thoughts on the future of D&T education, the role of academia in provoking new ideas, and the necessity of creating space for teachers to rethink the subject. David and I highlight the potential for D&T to be a powerful and transformative subject on the curriculum if it can evolve to address the pressing issues of our time.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Links to things mentioned in the show are  only available to subscribers.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this introductory episode of the second series of my Talking D&T podcast for 2024, I discuss the focus of the upcoming series on shaping design and technology education in England. The series, running from April to August 2024, will feature international speakers sharing their perspectives on the subject in their respective countries.

I explain the catalysts behind the series, including the decline in the number of pupils studying GCSE design and technology and proposals for transforming the curriculum. I have been attending various national meetings about the subject's current state and future development, hosted by organizations such as the Design Council. My podcast aims to bring these conversations to a wider audience and engage them in the discussion.

I have divided the series into three parts, focusing on design and technology's current status in England, what people think about this, and what is being done to address the issues. I have invited a diverse range of guests, including representatives from exam boards, subject associations, and international voices. I hope that listeners will find the series engaging and encourage them to get involved in the conversation by sharing their ideas and opinions. The first public episode will be released on April 16th, 2024, with a subscription-only episode available on April 11th for teachers and other subscribers to prompt further thinking based on the context of shaping design and technology education.

Mentioned in the episode
Design Council: An independent charity and the government's advisor on design. Matilda Agace will discuss the organisation's role in shaping D&T education.

Design and Technology Association, the only professional association for D&T education in the UK, actively involved in conversations about the subject's future.

Crafts Council: The national charity for craft in the UK. Nikki Dewar will discuss their perspective on D&T education and the role of craft.

Pearson's proposal, put forward by this education company, has served as a catalyst for current conversations and meetings surrounding the future of D&T education in England.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I interview Phil Jones, a full-time D&T teacher and subject leader at a school in Merseyside, who is also a part-time doctoral student at Liverpool John Moores University. Phil shares his experience as part of the organizing committee for the PATT (Pupils' Attitude Towards Technology) conference and discusses a paper that grabbed his attention during the event.

The paper, authored by Remke Klapwijk from the Netherlands, explores secondary students' intrinsic motivation during multidisciplinary STEAM projects. Phil and I delve into the study's findings, which surprisingly showed no significant effect on motivation despite the initial hypothesis. We also discuss the implications of these results for teaching practice and the importance of challenging assumptions about the impact of multidisciplinary projects on student motivation.

Phil also provides insights into his own doctoral research, which focuses on design thinking at Key Stage 3 D&T and the relationship between skills and knowledge. He explains his data collection methods, including using validated instruments, portfolios, presentations, student field notes, and focus groups. We discuss the value of pursuing postgraduate studies as a D&T teacher and the importance of research in providing an evidence base for the subject's impact. Finally, we reflect on the benefits of presenting at conferences, such as receiving valuable feedback and engaging with the wider D&T community.


(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Mentioned in the show

• Phil on LinkedIn 
• Work Upton School
• Klapwijk, R. (2023). Secondary Students Intrinsic Motivation during Multidisciplinary STEAM projects : A quantitative study on the influence of competence, autonomy and relatedness in secondary Dutch classrooms.
• Learning to Teach Design and Technology
• Technasium
• Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI)

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode, Alice Hellard and I explore the  impact of design on our lives and society. Alice's work highlights the importance of design education in navigating modern complexities, emphasising student agency and the dynamic relationship between humans and their environment.

We talk about how objects like smartphones influence behaviors and interactions, prompting a shift in educational focus towards process over outcomes. Everyday objects are also examined as a means of exploring personal values and political expression - hear me get very excited talking about the Memphis design movement!

Some of the topics we discuss are challenging to us both and maybe to listeners as well. We talk about ethical considerations in design education as we reflect on aesthetics, materials, and socio-political contexts plus we explore cultural  biases in museums and classrooms, and other social issues such as gender inequality.

Overall, we hope the episode offers an insightful exploration of the ethical dimensions of design, encouraging active engagement and reflection.


(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This is the first part of a conversation with Alice Hellard from Goldsmiths. We unravel the complexities of agency, design and objects agency in museum settings. Alice's research, presented at PATT40, looks at the often-overlooked emotional and philosophical connections we form with objects, and how these relationships are shaped by historical practices and curatorial decisions. Her research underscores the importance of bridging the gap between students and the items they study, challenging the conventional wisdom of design and technology education to foster a more profound understanding amongst students.

Throughout our conversation, we dissect the nuanced power dynamics of museum displays, using examples like nude heels and the globalization of fashion to illustrate the limitations of current curatorial practices and their impact on cultural representation. We share our personal stories with iconic design pieces that evoke deep emotional responses, emphasizing their significance in our lives. Alice champions a future where museums not only exhibit objects but also facilitate immersive experiences that democratize design comprehension. By the end of this episode, you'll be inspired to think differently about the role of design in our lives and the potential it has to shape our relationship with the world.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Are you a D&T teacher or researcher navigating the complex world of academic writing and conferences?

Unlock the mysteries of academic publishing as I sit down with Sarah Davies, the  editor-in-chief of the PATT40 conference. This week's episode explores the layers of the paper submission process, offering a comprehensive look at the journey from abstract to publication. We dissect the peer review system, emphasising its crucial role in fostering equality, diversity, and inclusion. If you're interested in what happens when you submit a paper, tune in to gain a deeper understanding of the supportive framework that upholds the integrity of educational research, and the collaborative efforts that ensure a manageable flow of contributions .

Concluding with a nod to the power of research, we examine the themes that came from the PATT40 conference: teaching methods, curriculum design, and assessment strategies , with a special focus on how D&T classroom studies can influence broader educational conversations

 In our conversation, Sarah reveals the confidence and empowerment that arise when teachers actively participate in research, arming them with the tools to challenge conventional wisdom and advocate for subject-specific teaching approaches. This episode is a testament to the collective wisdom of the D&T teaching community and a "how-to" for those poised to make a difference through their research.

(Text generated by AI, edited, a little, by Alison Hardy)

Links
Home - Camtree website supporting close-to-practice research for  teachers
Researching D&T website
Masculinities and Femininities in the Design and Technology Classroom
Promoting Creativity in the Secondary Design and Technology Classroom in England

Find Sarah
Threads 

LinkedIn 

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This week I'm talking with Alex, artist and lecturer in environmental design, and Sam, the design and technology curriculum lead at Oak National Academy.

Alex's research, presented at PATT40, is the starting point of the conversation. He focuses on the often-overlooked non-verbal intelligences and offers a fresh perspective on how we might better assess different cognitive strengths.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Find Alex online

Website

LinkedIn

Find Sam online
Website

LinkedIn

Greenhalgh, A. A. (2023) “‘If D&T wasn’t so easy, I wouldn’t be so good at it’: Nonverbal Ability and Confidence”, The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023, 1(October). Available at: https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/PATT40/article/view/1731 (Accessed: 5 February 2024).

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This week I chat with Neil Wright, whose unique path from the electronics industry to education brings a fresh perspective to his students at William Farr School. He talks with me about his attendance at the PATT-40 conference, sponsored by WF Education Group, where he had the opportunity to learn from and talk with D&T educational thought leaders.

In today's  conversation, we delve into the world of Adaptive Comparative Judgment using RM Compare software.

The episode culminates with me encouraging Neil to do some research on his own practice to share with other teachers. We also consider the sharing of research within the D&T educational community.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Links

• Work webpage: William Farr C of E Comprehensive School - Home
• LinkedIn: Neil Wright 
• Got Feedback: https://feedback.gotlearning.com
• WF Education group/ Technology Supplies
• RM Compare

Paper

Buckley, J., Seery, N. and Kimbell, R. (2023) “Modelling approaches to combining and comparing independent adaptive comparative judgement ranks”, The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023, 1(October). Available at: https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/PATT40/article/view/1570 (Accessed: 25 January 2024).

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Prepare to have your perspective on art and design education challenged as I sit down with Joanne Taylor, after the PATT 40 conference. She's here to share her thoughts on research from Oslo Metropolitan University on how AI text-to-image generators like Mid-journey, Dali-E, and Stable Diffusion are revolutionising the field. We dissect the conference highlights and reflect on the importance of staying abreast with academic research, you'll discover the keys to nurturing evidence-based learning in our ever-evolving educational landscape.

This week's discussion goes beyond mere tools, probing into the ethical terrain where technology meets education. We're tackling topics like combating bias, fostering originality, and ensuring that our students' innovation is expressed with clarity and depth. With Joanne's take on the ethical implications of AI in design and the importance of traditional skills in harmonising with new technologies, we share some thoughts about how AI can be used to guide your students into the future.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Ringvold, T. A., Strand, I., Haakonsen, P., & Saasen Strand, K. (2023). AI Text-to-Image Generation in Art and Design Teacher Education: A Creative Tool or a Hindrance to Future Creativity?. The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023, 1(October). Retrieved from https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/PATT40/article/view/1350

Links
Dall-E
Stable Diffusion
Midjourney
Paul Russell at Loughborough University

To  connect with Joanne:
LinkedIn

 jtdesignandtechnology.com

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Step into the world of the PATT 40 conference with Dr. Matt McLain, who shares his  insights and experiences from this groundbreaking event. As the conference chair, Matt explains the conference's aim to unite design and technology research, and classroom practice in a meaningful symphony. In this episode we talk about  the conference's emphasis on diversity, its aim to incorporate teachers in research, and the celebration of plurality within D&T education. The PATT conference is the international space for sharing D&T research and the dedication to making academic research not just accessible but actionable for educators on the front lines.

We  discuss the personal triumphs and collective achievements of the recent PATT40 conference.

The expertise of three teachers, who I'm working with, brought a co-authored paper to life, as an example of how the conference was committed to  teacher-involved research.

The Liverpool PATT conference was a landmark as the first completely face to face meeting since the COVID pandemic. As we close the episode, Matt and mine's thoughts turn to the future—pondering a  position that beckons with the potential to further academic and teaching aspirations.

(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

Links
PATT40 papers
PATT40 website
EdD at Nottingham Trent University

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This episode is unusual in that there is also a video that goes alongside it where you can see me and Ciaran talking as I am live editing his debate that he's submitted as an example of a response to one of the contentious questions.

Link to the video:  https://youtu.be/QrBNYNC7fo8

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode:

Link to the video: https://youtu.be/QrBNYNC7fo8

Find out more about the project and how to get involved:

Guidance for responding: 'Have Your Say'

18 questions 

How to respond to the questions:  use this link to upload your responses: https://ntupsychology.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_e3uA5bBcRdmPD5s

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

A few weeks ago I attended an event hosted by the Design Council with a broad group of people who were pulling together thoughts to be used to lobby the UK government about funding some developments in D&T.

I was asked to share thoughts about what could be done. In this episode I read out my notes, with some extra bits, about my ideas. As usual, I"m open to feedback and comments!

There is more to follow in the next episode which is only available to subscribers and Creator Patreons.

Episode transcript

Mentioned in the episode
https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/cls-studies/millennium-cohort-study/

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This week it's a pod takeover from Amanda, Ciaran and Andy. They are launching the project (re)designing D&T inviting you to answer the 18 contentious questions.

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

Project overview

Guidance for responding: 'Have Your Say'

18 questions 

How to respond to the questions:  use this link to upload your responses: https://ntupsychology.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_e3uA5bBcRdmPD5s

Halliwell, A., Mason, A., Hardy, A., & Ellis, C. (2023). A DEVELOPING PROJECT: INVESTIGATING FUTURE FORMS OF DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION. The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023, 1(October). Retrieved from https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/PATT40/article/view/1627


If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Twitter @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you want to ask a question or leave me a message, you can do this on Speakpipe.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

This podcast is funded by consultancy work I do outside my full time job at Nottingham Trent University and my beloved Patrons. Patrons receive exclusive content and various rewards, depending on their level of support, such as access to my special private Patreon-only  posts and signed copies of my books. Patrons can also suggest topics for my podcast. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. Whilst ongoing support would be fantastic you can make a one-time donation instead, through PayPal (contact me to for details), if that works better for you. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Its been a while since its just been me on there, but this week I'm giving an update on what's been happening, some additions to the podcast and plans for the future.

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

Redesigning D&T project:

18 contentious questions

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

I'm joined this week by a former student of mine, Sam Reynolds. As I taught him I felt more entitled than normal to ask difficult questions (spoiler alert - he handled them very well 😉)

You can find Sam on Twitter: MrReynoldsDT

School Webpage - https://www.st-pauls.org.uk/

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

6 Material Areas  

• Woods, Metals and Plastics 
• Graphics, Cards and Boards
• Engineering
• CAD/CAM 
• Food Preparation and Nutrition
• Fashion and Textiles 

The St Paul's Learning Talents that we've interwoven throughout the Design and Technology curriculum  

• Thought Process - "Working it out! Applying what you know."
• Academic Articulation - "Communicating like a scholar."
• Linking Learning - "Making and using connections"
• Evaluation - "Asking .... To what extent? Would it be better if?"
• Necessary Knowledge - "Being curious to know."
• Tenacity - "Independence in and beyond the classroom."
• Strategic Approach - "Knowing the best approaches to get the best outcomes" 

The 5 categories that we've split into 'technical principles' knowledge 

• "The materials around us" 
• "DT and our world"
• "Confidence in Drawing"
• "How things work" 
• "Food Preparation and Nutrition" 

Students revisit these categories each year in KS3. We assess students understanding in each of these areas, as well their progress in "design and make" projects.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This was a new topic for me - outdoor learning in D&T. Sue Taplin talks about her work as a forest schools leader and her EdD

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Amanda and I talk about Niekie Blom's fabulous chapter from the Debates in D&T book: Design cognition in design and technology classrooms.

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

Debates in D&T Education, chapter 14.
Niekie Blom

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This week I'm talking with Russell Hill, award winning D&T teacher from Houlton School, about setting up a new KS3 curriculum.

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode
Houlton School

Twitter: @Mr_Hill_DT

Curriculum Overview - https://www.houltonschool.org.uk/curriculum-2/curriculum-overview/ 

Learning Journey (D&T - https://www.houltonschool.org.uk/assets/Documents/Letters/Learning-Journey-Design-Technology-v3.pdf

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

We've sorted out the data and now we have 18 contentious questions that we think are up for debate.
Listen to me, Amanda and Ciaran talk about the next stage of the Redesigning D&T project and how you can get involved.

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

Expressions of interest survey

18 contentious questions

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

I'm joined by Georgia McLean and Claire Vickery to debate - does food fit in D&T?

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode
Debates in D&T book

Resources
Georgia has kindly shared some resources about her Trust's D&T curriculum. These are share under the Creative Commons licence: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Georgia McLean D&T curriculum

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

I'm no expert on primary D&T at all, so I talked to someone who is. Janine Pavlis is a teacher educator at St Mary's University in London and we talk about how primary D&T teachers are training and some current research that Janine is just beginning. She'll be back to talk about this some more soon - I promise!

Episode transcript

You can find Janine and more about her work in these places:

Twitter: @JaninePavlisDT 

Achieving for Children - https://www.achievingforchildren.org.uk/

St Mary's University - https://www.stmarys.ac.uk/home.aspx

PATT40 - https://patt40liverpool.edublogs.org/

Design and Technology Teacher Education blog -

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Scott Tweeddale shares how he is planning his secondary D&T curriculum at his school.

Episode transcript

You can find Scott on Twitter: @MrScott_T

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Andy Marston has been teaching for 36 years, 27 in one school. Listen to him reflect on the developments and changes in D&T


Episode transcript

Summary

• Who is Andy Marston and what does he do? 0:01
• Does food fit into the design and technology curriculum? 3:07
• How the Pearson's proposals imply that there will be less opportunity for children to realise their designs. 9:36
• Relations between exam boards and school subjects. 14:59
• What is the essence of design and technology? 18:21
• The importance of understanding where the children are from. 23:41
• The importance of understanding what you’re doing. 32:09
• What’s the point of the GCSE? 35:35

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This week I'm critiquing some published work to give an insight into how anyone can look at research to hold it to account.
As teachers and school leaders are begin encouraged to be research informed I think we also need to be research literate, this involves being able to evaluate whether a piece of research is 'good'. In this episode I use four criteria to evaluate Pearson's published research to answer the question: is this a good research project?

The criteria used are:

1. What is the research question or aim?
2. What is the methodology and method?
3. Who are the participants?
4. Does the evidence justify the claims?

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode
Pearson unveils vision for future-proofed design education curriculum
The Future of Design Education
The Value of D&T on Zenodo
Redesigning D&T data on Zenodo

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

I'm struggling to find blogs by D&T teachers who are sharing how they plan and teach D&T. In this episode I talk about why I want to read D&T teachers' blogs and why we need to hear about teachers' practice. If you want to start a blog I give some tips for how to get going.

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

David and Torben for D&T
Researching D&T
D&T Teacher education

My blogposts:

• Should I stay or should I go (from Twitter)?
• Research capacity and engagement in Design & Technology education
• How do we do race in D & T?

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

I have a new book out and I'm offering you a chance to win a copy.  In other words, I'm shamelessly plugging it 😉
In all seriousness, I'm actually recommending it to read. There are 16 chapters written by different authors, so you get to hear lots of views about D&T.

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

Buy the book from Routledge

Enter by 28th February 2023 to win a copy of the new Debates in D&T book by either (or do all 3!):

1. Signing up to my newsletter via my website
2. Leaving me a voice memo on Speakpipe
3. Writing a review on Apple Podcasts (use your real name so I can find you!)

The winner will be announced in March on my podcast, in my newsletter and on social media. 

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Dr Matt McLain is back and this time talking about PATT40, one of the best spaces to share your D&T practice. Listen to Matt and me reminisce about previous PATT conferences and explain how you can get involved in 2023.

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

PATT40 website
Preparing to share your research

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

When is the right time to teach new knowledge in D&T? Maybe a better question is: is there a right time?
In this episode I talk about just-in-time teaching of knowledge.

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

Design and technology in a knowledge economy 

A framework for design decisions Hilda Beaumont (formerly David Barlex)

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

When is the right time to teach pupils new knowledge in D&T? Well, I don't have an answer this week but I do have plenty of thoughts to share. There will be more in the next episode too!

Episode transcript

Debates in D&T Education
Redesigning D&T survey
Me on TikTok
Newsletter


Mentioned in this episode


If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Twitter @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you want to ask a question or leave me a message, you can do this on Speakpipe.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

This podcast is funded by consultancy work I do outside my full time job at Nottingham Trent University and my beloved Patrons. Patrons receive exclusive content and various rewards, depending on their level of support, such as access to my special private Patreon-only  posts and signed copies of my books. Patrons can also suggest topics for my podcast. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. Whilst ongoing support would be fantastic you can make a one-time donation instead, through PayPal (contact me to for details), if that works better for you. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This is the third of 3 episodes launching the Redesigning D&T project.

Listen to all 3 and fill in the survey: Do you agree with the contentious questions?

You might find it helpful to download the discussion notes: Contentious questions

Episode transcript

Related episodes:
TD&T18: How can design not be considered as central to engaging with the future?

TD&T22 What designers know and how they know it

TD&T28 Eddie and Alison talking about D&T and epistemology

TD&T31 Are there different ways of knowing?

The Kurt Seeman episodes: 33 - 34, 36 & 37

TD&T13: Talking design and/or technology 2.0 with David Spendlove

TD&T107 Talking about the rise and fall of D&T with Professor David Spendlove

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Twitter @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you want to ask a question or leave me a message, you can do this on Speakpipe.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

This podcast is funded by consultancy work I do outside my full time job at Nottingham Trent University and my beloved Patrons. Patrons receive exclusive content and various rewards, depending on their level of support, such as access to my special private Patreon-only  posts and signed copies of my books. Patrons can also suggest topics for my podcast. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. Whilst ongoing support would be fantastic you can make a one-time donation instead, through PayPal (contact me to for details), if that works better for you. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This is the second of 3 episodes launching the Redesigning D&T project.

Listen to all 3 and fill in the survey: Do you agree with the contentious questions?

You might find it helpful to download the discussion notes: Contentious questions

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

TD&T13: Talking design and/or technology 2.0 with David Spendlove
Our book: Redesigning D&T

Related episodes:
TD&T18: How can design not be considered as central to engaging with the future?

TD&T22 What designers know and how they know it

TD&T28 Eddie and Alison talking about D&T and epistemology

TD&T31 Are there different ways of knowing?

The Kurt Seeman episodes: 33 - 34, 36 & 37

TD&T13: Talking design and/or technology 2.0 with David Spendlove

TD&T107 Talking about the rise and fall of D&T with Professor David Spendlove

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Twitter @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you want to ask a question or leave me a message, you can do this on Speakpipe.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

This podcast is funded by consultancy work I do outside my full time job at Nottingham Trent University and my beloved Patrons. Patrons receive exclusive content and various rewards, depending on their level of support, such as access to my special private Patreon-only  posts and signed copies of my books. Patrons can also suggest topics for my podcast. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. Whilst ongoing support would be fantastic you can make a one-time donation instead, through PayPal (contact me to for details), if that works better for you. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. 

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This is the first of 3 episodes launching the Redesigning D&T project.

Listen to all 3 and fill in the survey: Do you agree with the contentious questions?

You might find it helpful to download the discussion notes: Contentious questions

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

Related episodes:
TD&T18: How can design not be considered as central to engaging with the future?