<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://rss.buzzsprout.com/styles.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <atom:link href="https://rss.buzzsprout.com/2572479.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
  <atom:link href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
  <title>Re:Engineered</title>

  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:17:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
  <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast</link>
  <language>en</language>
  <copyright>© 2026 Re:Engineered</copyright>
  <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <podcast:guid>8004d657-2988-5e2c-87eb-8bd52d600d06</podcast:guid>
  <podcast:txt purpose="verify">chris@chrisstasiuk.com</podcast:txt>
  <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
  <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
  <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>Re:Engineered is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals who've realized that being great at the technical work isn't enough anymore.</p><p></p><p>Hosted by Chris Stasiuk, an engineer turned coach who spent 25 years growing from project engineer to shareholder at an engineering consulting firm, and now coaches technical professionals on the leadership skills no one taught them.</p><p></p><p>The show treats communication, leadership, and influence as systems. Not personality traits. Not corporate theater. Skills you can learn and apply without pretending to be someone you're not.</p><p></p><p>Episodes include solo takes, newsletter riffs, and conversations with engineers and experts in areas technical professionals often overlook. No theory. Real frameworks from real engineering environments, with direct guidance on managing up, leading without authority, and navigating difficult conversations.</p><p></p><p>No buzzwords. No corporate platitudes. No advice from consultants who've never built anything.</p><p></p><p>If you're the one who actually solves the problems but keep getting passed over for people who talk more than they contribute, this podcast was built for you.</p><p></p><p>Because being a great engineer isn't enough anymore.</p>]]></description>
  <generator>Buzzsprout (https://www.buzzsprout.com)</generator>
  <itunes:owner>
    <itunes:name>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:name>
    <itunes:email>chris@chrisstasiuk.com</itunes:email>
  </itunes:owner>
  
  <itunes:image href="https://storage.buzzsprout.com/rcptan50rfwuwwxs9dkx4ky8el6v?.jpg" />
  <itunes:category text="Business">
    <itunes:category text="Careers" />
  </itunes:category>
  <podcast:person role="host" href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/chrisstasiuk" img="https://storage.buzzsprout.com/aow2bpx0usih5bkl7yjv8yomnnh0">Chris Stasiuk</podcast:person>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Why Engineers Confuse Their Title With Their Credibility</itunes:title>
    <title>Why Engineers Confuse Their Title With Their Credibility</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Most engineers stepping into leadership have the credentials. The degree, the certification, the years on the job. What they don’t have yet is earned credibility, and that gap is real whether they acknowledge it or not. There are two ways to handle it: assert your way across it, or learn your way across it. The first closes the gap on paper. The second closes it in reality. This episode draws on a conversation with a retired Canadian Armed Forces lieutenant colonel whose first six months in c...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Most engineers stepping into leadership have the credentials. The degree, the certification, the years on the job. What they don’t have yet is earned credibility, and that gap is real whether they acknowledge it or not. There are two ways to handle it: assert your way across it, or learn your way across it. The first closes the gap on paper. The second closes it in reality. This episode draws on a conversation with a retired Canadian Armed Forces lieutenant colonel whose first six months in command maps almost perfectly onto what happens when engineers get their first leadership role.</p><p><br/></p><p><b>What You Will Take Away</b></p><ul><li>The gap between your title and your earned credibility is real on day one. Asserting your way across it makes it invisible. Learning your way across it makes it temporary.</li><li>Two failure modes show up when engineers step into leadership: assertion mode, where the team learns to wait you out, and the disappearing act, where you defer to everyone and show up with no point of view.</li><li>The third path is holding the role clearly: make decisions, stay responsible, and be honest about what you don’t know while staying genuinely curious about what the people around you do.</li><li>Your credentials got you in the room. They don’t get you the room. That part is earned through actual work and actual conversations, not through asserting it away.</li><li>Military colleges have a reputation for producing officers who arrive knowing everything. Engineering has the same problem. The iron ring does not confer credibility. It starts the clock on earning it.</li><li>The engineers who build credibility fastest treat the people around them as the resource, not as the problem.</li><li>One question worth sitting with: who around you actually knows things you don’t yet? Name them. Then figure out how you’re using that resource.</li></ul><p> </p><p><b>Who This Is For</b></p><ul><li>Engineers who just got promoted and are trying to prove they deserve it.</li><li>New managers who feel the pull to over-explain and over-certify every decision.</li><li>Engineers who have gone quiet in a leadership role because they don’t feel ready.</li><li>Anyone who has watched a new leader assert authority and seen the team tune them out.</li><li>Engineers who know the gap is real but haven’t named it yet.</li></ul><p> </p><p>Follow Re:Engineered wherever you get your podcasts.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most engineers stepping into leadership have the credentials. The degree, the certification, the years on the job. What they don’t have yet is earned credibility, and that gap is real whether they acknowledge it or not. There are two ways to handle it: assert your way across it, or learn your way across it. The first closes the gap on paper. The second closes it in reality. This episode draws on a conversation with a retired Canadian Armed Forces lieutenant colonel whose first six months in command maps almost perfectly onto what happens when engineers get their first leadership role.</p><p><br/></p><p><b>What You Will Take Away</b></p><ul><li>The gap between your title and your earned credibility is real on day one. Asserting your way across it makes it invisible. Learning your way across it makes it temporary.</li><li>Two failure modes show up when engineers step into leadership: assertion mode, where the team learns to wait you out, and the disappearing act, where you defer to everyone and show up with no point of view.</li><li>The third path is holding the role clearly: make decisions, stay responsible, and be honest about what you don’t know while staying genuinely curious about what the people around you do.</li><li>Your credentials got you in the room. They don’t get you the room. That part is earned through actual work and actual conversations, not through asserting it away.</li><li>Military colleges have a reputation for producing officers who arrive knowing everything. Engineering has the same problem. The iron ring does not confer credibility. It starts the clock on earning it.</li><li>The engineers who build credibility fastest treat the people around them as the resource, not as the problem.</li><li>One question worth sitting with: who around you actually knows things you don’t yet? Name them. Then figure out how you’re using that resource.</li></ul><p> </p><p><b>Who This Is For</b></p><ul><li>Engineers who just got promoted and are trying to prove they deserve it.</li><li>New managers who feel the pull to over-explain and over-certify every decision.</li><li>Engineers who have gone quiet in a leadership role because they don’t feel ready.</li><li>Anyone who has watched a new leader assert authority and seen the team tune them out.</li><li>Engineers who know the gap is real but haven’t named it yet.</li></ul><p> </p><p>Follow Re:Engineered wherever you get your podcasts.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/19246762-why-engineers-confuse-their-title-with-their-credibility.mp3" length="7606476" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-023-why-engineers-confuse-their-title-with-their-credibility/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-19246762</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19246762/transcript" type="text/html" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19246762/transcript.json" type="application/json" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19246762/transcript.srt" type="application/x-subrip" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19246762/transcript.vtt" type="text/vtt" />
    <itunes:duration>631</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>credibility gap, title vs credibility, engineering leadership, new leadership role, earned authority, assertion vs learning, role transition, military leadership, identity gap, first 90 days</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Someone’s Running a Model of You</itunes:title>
    <title>Someone’s Running a Model of You</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Engineers think they have a communication problem. They have a system problem. Every individual communication failure compounds into a predictive model that other people run of you, and that model is what gets used in rooms you’re not in. Chris tells the story of being told over beers that some of his clients thought he was a real piece of work, then unpacks how he’d been counting only the deliberate signals while ignoring the noise. The capstone of the Communication System arc, this episode ...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Engineers think they have a communication problem. They have a system problem. Every individual communication failure compounds into a predictive model that other people run of you, and that model is what gets used in rooms you’re not in. Chris tells the story of being told over beers that some of his clients thought he was a real piece of work, then unpacks how he’d been counting only the deliberate signals while ignoring the noise. The capstone of the Communication System arc, this episode names the cumulative effect of every communication act and gives engineers an audit for predicting and adjusting the model their decision surface is running of them.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers think they have a communication problem. They have a system problem. Every individual communication failure compounds into a predictive model that other people run of you, and that model is what gets used in rooms you’re not in. Chris tells the story of being told over beers that some of his clients thought he was a real piece of work, then unpacks how he’d been counting only the deliberate signals while ignoring the noise. The capstone of the Communication System arc, this episode names the cumulative effect of every communication act and gives engineers an audit for predicting and adjusting the model their decision surface is running of them.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/19207245-someone-s-running-a-model-of-you.mp3" length="5992688" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-022-someones-running-a-model-of-you/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-19207245</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19207245/transcript" type="text/html" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19207245/transcript.json" type="application/json" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19207245/transcript.srt" type="application/x-subrip" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19207245/transcript.vtt" type="text/vtt" />
    <itunes:duration>496</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>predictive model, cumulative signal, signal-to-noise ratio, deliberate communication, leakage, decision surface, engineering leadership, communication system, secondhand signal, system identification</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>The Room Changed. Did You?</itunes:title>
    <title>The Room Changed. Did You?</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Engineers don’t fail in high-stakes rooms because their analysis is wrong. They fail because they’re answering in the wrong unit. A project manager walks a client through a scope change in hours; the client asks for dollars; the PM keeps giving hours. The problem isn’t accuracy — it’s currency. Every room runs on a different one: internally it’s hours and feasibility, for clients it’s cost and timeline, for senior leadership it’s exposure and consequence. When you force the other person to do...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Engineers don’t fail in high-stakes rooms because their analysis is wrong. They fail because they’re answering in the wrong unit. A project manager walks a client through a scope change in hours; the client asks for dollars; the PM keeps giving hours. The problem isn’t accuracy — it’s currency. Every room runs on a different one: internally it’s hours and feasibility, for clients it’s cost and timeline, for senior leadership it’s exposure and consequence. When you force the other person to do the conversion, you’re making them do your job. This episode introduces a single pre-meeting question and a three-part structure — impact, exposure, recommendation — that compresses technical analysis into something decision-ready without losing the rigor underneath.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers don’t fail in high-stakes rooms because their analysis is wrong. They fail because they’re answering in the wrong unit. A project manager walks a client through a scope change in hours; the client asks for dollars; the PM keeps giving hours. The problem isn’t accuracy — it’s currency. Every room runs on a different one: internally it’s hours and feasibility, for clients it’s cost and timeline, for senior leadership it’s exposure and consequence. When you force the other person to do the conversion, you’re making them do your job. This episode introduces a single pre-meeting question and a three-part structure — impact, exposure, recommendation — that compresses technical analysis into something decision-ready without losing the rigor underneath.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/19168787-the-room-changed-did-you.mp3" length="8146524" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-021-the-room-changed-did-you/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-19168787</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19168787/transcript" type="text/html" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19168787/transcript.json" type="application/json" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19168787/transcript.srt" type="application/x-subrip" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19168787/transcript.vtt" type="text/vtt" />
    <itunes:duration>676</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>communication, engineering, leadership, decision-making, audience calibration, stakeholder communication, technical translation, judgment, meetings, project management</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>You Went Quiet. They Filled in the Gap.</itunes:title>
    <title>You Went Quiet. They Filled in the Gap.</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Engineers don't lie about what they don't know. They go quiet. That instinct is correct in technical work, where you don't sign off on a calc you haven't verified. It backfires in leadership, where silence isn't neutral and the room fills it in with whatever leaks through. This episode names the three failure modes that look like professionalism from the inside and ghosting from the outside, and gives the three-part pattern engineers can use instead: what you know, what you don't, and when yo...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Engineers don&apos;t lie about what they don&apos;t know. They go quiet. That instinct is correct in technical work, where you don&apos;t sign off on a calc you haven&apos;t verified. It backfires in leadership, where silence isn&apos;t neutral and the room fills it in with whatever leaks through. This episode names the three failure modes that look like professionalism from the inside and ghosting from the outside, and gives the three-part pattern engineers can use instead: what you know, what you don&apos;t, and when you&apos;ll know more.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers don&apos;t lie about what they don&apos;t know. They go quiet. That instinct is correct in technical work, where you don&apos;t sign off on a calc you haven&apos;t verified. It backfires in leadership, where silence isn&apos;t neutral and the room fills it in with whatever leaks through. This episode names the three failure modes that look like professionalism from the inside and ghosting from the outside, and gives the three-part pattern engineers can use instead: what you know, what you don&apos;t, and when you&apos;ll know more.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/19132798-you-went-quiet-they-filled-in-the-gap.mp3" length="5808695" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-020-you-went-quiet-they-filled-in-the-gap/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-19132798</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19132798/transcript" type="text/html" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19132798/transcript.json" type="application/json" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19132798/transcript.srt" type="application/x-subrip" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19132798/transcript.vtt" type="text/vtt" />
    <itunes:duration>481</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>silence as signal, communicating uncertainty, progress updates, parked questions, unraised risk, early flagging, engineering leadership, under-communicating, stakeholder trust, credibility</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Information Isn&#39;t Communication Until Someone Can Use It</itunes:title>
    <title>Information Isn&#39;t Communication Until Someone Can Use It</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Engineers operate on a transmission model. You send, therefore you’ve communicated. But communication with people who have to act on the information isn’t a transmission. It’s a confirmed receipt. Chris breaks down a sixteen-month project that ended in a small-talk-to-firestorm phone call because critical scope and budget changes had been technically delivered, but never confirmed. The fix is mechanical: a three-step protocol that turns email into the record and the call into the actual commu...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Engineers operate on a transmission model. You send, therefore you’ve communicated. But communication with people who have to act on the information isn’t a transmission. It’s a confirmed receipt. Chris breaks down a sixteen-month project that ended in a small-talk-to-firestorm phone call because critical scope and budget changes had been technically delivered, but never confirmed. The fix is mechanical: a three-step protocol that turns email into the record and the call into the actual communication.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers operate on a transmission model. You send, therefore you’ve communicated. But communication with people who have to act on the information isn’t a transmission. It’s a confirmed receipt. Chris breaks down a sixteen-month project that ended in a small-talk-to-firestorm phone call because critical scope and budget changes had been technically delivered, but never confirmed. The fix is mechanical: a three-step protocol that turns email into the record and the call into the actual communication.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/19095109-information-isn-t-communication-until-someone-can-use-it.mp3" length="5709673" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-019-information-isnt-communication-until-someone-can-use-it/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-19095109</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19095109/transcript" type="text/html" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19095109/transcript.json" type="application/json" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19095109/transcript.srt" type="application/x-subrip" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19095109/transcript.vtt" type="text/vtt" />
    <itunes:duration>472</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>communication, transmission model, confirmed receipt, client communication, project management, scope changes, engineering leadership, communication protocol, signal extraction, accountability</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>You Answered a Question Nobody Asked</itunes:title>
    <title>You Answered a Question Nobody Asked</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Engineers default to comprehensiveness because leaving something out feels wrong. In a design review or on a set of drawings, that instinct is correct. In leadership, it backfires. The person asking the question usually isn’t requesting a briefing — they’re trying to make a decision, and when you deliver more than they asked for, you don’t look thorough. You look like you can’t tell what matters from what doesn’t. Using a story about a technically brilliant direct report who buried every answ...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Engineers default to comprehensiveness because leaving something out feels wrong. In a design review or on a set of drawings, that instinct is correct. In leadership, it backfires. The person asking the question usually isn’t requesting a briefing — they’re trying to make a decision, and when you deliver more than they asked for, you don’t look thorough. You look like you can’t tell what matters from what doesn’t. Using a story about a technically brilliant direct report who buried every answer in context, Chris walks through the design target engineers need to swap in: tailoring the response to what the receiver can actually use, with precision held in reserve rather than delivered by default. The active move is a single question to ask before the next significant response.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers default to comprehensiveness because leaving something out feels wrong. In a design review or on a set of drawings, that instinct is correct. In leadership, it backfires. The person asking the question usually isn’t requesting a briefing — they’re trying to make a decision, and when you deliver more than they asked for, you don’t look thorough. You look like you can’t tell what matters from what doesn’t. Using a story about a technically brilliant direct report who buried every answer in context, Chris walks through the design target engineers need to swap in: tailoring the response to what the receiver can actually use, with precision held in reserve rather than delivered by default. The active move is a single question to ask before the next significant response.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/19057375-you-answered-a-question-nobody-asked.mp3" length="6058524" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-018-you-answered-a-question-nobody-asked/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-19057375</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19057375/transcript" type="text/html" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19057375/transcript.json" type="application/json" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19057375/transcript.srt" type="application/x-subrip" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19057375/transcript.vtt" type="text/vtt" />
    <itunes:duration>502</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>communication design, leadership communication, decision support, signal and noise, information overload, engineering instincts, usability, right level of detail, reading the room</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>The Visibility Problem</itunes:title>
    <title>The Visibility Problem</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Engineers can have every leadership mechanic in place and still be invisible to the people who matter. The problem isn’t the quality of work. It’s an undesigned signal path between that work and the people making decisions about their career. This episode introduces the Signal Path Audit: map the decision surface, trace how information about your work currently reaches each person on it, and close the gap where the path is too long or too lossy. Using a personal story where structural compres...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Engineers can have every leadership mechanic in place and still be invisible to the people who matter. The problem isn’t the quality of work. It’s an undesigned signal path between that work and the people making decisions about their career. This episode introduces the Signal Path Audit: map the decision surface, trace how information about your work currently reaches each person on it, and close the gap where the path is too long or too lossy. Using a personal story where structural compression attributed his work to someone else, Chris names the distinction that unlocks the whole problem: self-promotion says “look at me”; signal design says “here’s the information you need to make a good decision.” This episode closes the Relationship System arc. Visibility is the output signal of the external operating system built across the last four episodes.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers can have every leadership mechanic in place and still be invisible to the people who matter. The problem isn’t the quality of work. It’s an undesigned signal path between that work and the people making decisions about their career. This episode introduces the Signal Path Audit: map the decision surface, trace how information about your work currently reaches each person on it, and close the gap where the path is too long or too lossy. Using a personal story where structural compression attributed his work to someone else, Chris names the distinction that unlocks the whole problem: self-promotion says “look at me”; signal design says “here’s the information you need to make a good decision.” This episode closes the Relationship System arc. Visibility is the output signal of the external operating system built across the last four episodes.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/19018637-the-visibility-problem.mp3" length="6571646" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-017-the-visibility-problem/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-19018637</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19018637/transcript" type="text/html" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19018637/transcript.json" type="application/json" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19018637/transcript.srt" type="application/x-subrip" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/19018637/transcript.vtt" type="text/vtt" />
    <itunes:duration>544</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>signal path, visibility, engineering leadership, decision surface, signal design, career development, upward communication, organizational influence</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Conflict Is a Signal, Not a Failure</itunes:title>
    <title>Conflict Is a Signal, Not a Failure</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Engineers treat conflict like a system fault — find the root cause, fix it, restore steady state. In human systems, that instinct doesn’t resolve conflict. It suppresses it, and suppressed conflict doesn’t disappear. It migrates downstream and detonates where you have the least control and the highest cost. Using a real situation where avoiding early friction with a young engineer led to a near fist fight with a client and a threat to blacklist the company, Chris walks through the pattern: bl...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Engineers treat conflict like a system fault — find the root cause, fix it, restore steady state. In human systems, that instinct doesn’t resolve conflict. It suppresses it, and suppressed conflict doesn’t disappear. It migrates downstream and detonates where you have the least control and the highest cost. Using a real situation where avoiding early friction with a young engineer led to a near fist fight with a client and a threat to blacklist the company, Chris walks through the pattern: block the signal upstream, it explodes downstream. The episode distinguishes productive friction (signal) from destructive friction (noise) and gives three concrete moves for reading and using conflict instead of eliminating it.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers treat conflict like a system fault — find the root cause, fix it, restore steady state. In human systems, that instinct doesn’t resolve conflict. It suppresses it, and suppressed conflict doesn’t disappear. It migrates downstream and detonates where you have the least control and the highest cost. Using a real situation where avoiding early friction with a young engineer led to a near fist fight with a client and a threat to blacklist the company, Chris walks through the pattern: block the signal upstream, it explodes downstream. The episode distinguishes productive friction (signal) from destructive friction (noise) and gives three concrete moves for reading and using conflict instead of eliminating it.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18980772-conflict-is-a-signal-not-a-failure.mp3" length="5683613" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-016-conflict-is-a-signal-not-a-failure/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18980772</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/18980772/transcript" type="text/html" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/18980772/transcript.json" type="application/json" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/18980772/transcript.srt" type="application/x-subrip" />
    <podcast:transcript url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/18980772/transcript.vtt" type="text/vtt" />
    <itunes:duration>470</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>conflict, signal design, suppression, cost of dissent, productive friction, destructive friction, feedback systems, engineering leadership, lateral relationships</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Nobody Reports to You</itunes:title>
    <title>Nobody Reports to You</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Engineers trying to influence peers, contractors, and cross-functional teams face a total authority gap — and they handle it badly. The default moves are logic and persuasion, which creates resistance, or avoidance, which creates a self-built bottleneck. This episode introduces the third path: lateral influence built on shared stakes. Using two summers working as construction manager for a client — where the contractors answered to nobody he managed — Chris shows how one plainly stated fact m...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Engineers trying to influence peers, contractors, and cross-functional teams face a total authority gap — and they handle it badly. The default moves are logic and persuasion, which creates resistance, or avoidance, which creates a self-built bottleneck. This episode introduces the third path: lateral influence built on shared stakes. Using two summers working as construction manager for a client — where the contractors answered to nobody he managed — Chris shows how one plainly stated fact moved faster than any airtight case. The mechanic isn’t persuasion. It’s finding the problem that’s already everyone’s problem and naming it out loud.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers trying to influence peers, contractors, and cross-functional teams face a total authority gap — and they handle it badly. The default moves are logic and persuasion, which creates resistance, or avoidance, which creates a self-built bottleneck. This episode introduces the third path: lateral influence built on shared stakes. Using two summers working as construction manager for a client — where the contractors answered to nobody he managed — Chris shows how one plainly stated fact moved faster than any airtight case. The mechanic isn’t persuasion. It’s finding the problem that’s already everyone’s problem and naming it out loud.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18942564-nobody-reports-to-you.mp3" length="3982386" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-015-nobody-reports-to-you/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18942564</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>329</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>lateral influence, shared stakes, stakeholder management, engineering leadership, authority gap, peer relationships, construction management</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Your Boss Is a Stakeholder Too</itunes:title>
    <title>Your Boss Is a Stakeholder Too</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Most engineers are deliberate about the signal they send downward and sideways. The upward signal gets left to chance — not because it seems unimportant, but because “managing up” sounds like politics. This episode reframes it: your boss is a stakeholder, and you already know how to manage stakeholders. The failure isn’t effort, it’s misclassification. Three failure modes — the silent performer, the firehose, the always-fine — all produce the same result: a boss making decisions about your ca...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Most engineers are deliberate about the signal they send downward and sideways. The upward signal gets left to chance — not because it seems unimportant, but because “managing up” sounds like politics. This episode reframes it: your boss is a stakeholder, and you already know how to manage stakeholders. The failure isn’t effort, it’s misclassification. Three failure modes — the silent performer, the firehose, the always-fine — all produce the same result: a boss making decisions about your career on incomplete information you had but never sent. The fix is mechanical, not political: own the agenda, calibrate the signal, and stop leaving the most leverage-heavy relationship in your career on autopilot.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most engineers are deliberate about the signal they send downward and sideways. The upward signal gets left to chance — not because it seems unimportant, but because “managing up” sounds like politics. This episode reframes it: your boss is a stakeholder, and you already know how to manage stakeholders. The failure isn’t effort, it’s misclassification. Three failure modes — the silent performer, the firehose, the always-fine — all produce the same result: a boss making decisions about your career on incomplete information you had but never sent. The fix is mechanical, not political: own the agenda, calibrate the signal, and stop leaving the most leverage-heavy relationship in your career on autopilot.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18904245-your-boss-is-a-stakeholder-too.mp3" length="4870150" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-014-your-boss-is-a-stakeholder-too/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18904245</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>402</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>managing up, signal engineering, engineering leadership, stakeholder management, career development, upward communication, influence</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>When Precision Is the Wrong Tool</itunes:title>
    <title>When Precision Is the Wrong Tool</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Most engineers apply the same level of analytical rigor to every decision regardless of what it actually requires. That’s not thoroughness — it’s a mismatch, and it signals to everyone watching that you don’t trust the team, yourself, or the process to handle uncertainty. This episode introduces decision triage: the skill of classifying what a decision requires before committing to a level of analysis, then matching the rigor to the classification. Using a real example from a water system rep...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Most engineers apply the same level of analytical rigor to every decision regardless of what it actually requires. That’s not thoroughness — it’s a mismatch, and it signals to everyone watching that you don’t trust the team, yourself, or the process to handle uncertainty. This episode introduces decision triage: the skill of classifying what a decision requires before committing to a level of analysis, then matching the rigor to the classification. Using a real example from a water system repair, Chris walks through what triage looks like in practice — including a four-question framework engineers can run in under two minutes. The episode closes the arc: precision is about being right; triage is about being appropriately right.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most engineers apply the same level of analytical rigor to every decision regardless of what it actually requires. That’s not thoroughness — it’s a mismatch, and it signals to everyone watching that you don’t trust the team, yourself, or the process to handle uncertainty. This episode introduces decision triage: the skill of classifying what a decision requires before committing to a level of analysis, then matching the rigor to the classification. Using a real example from a water system repair, Chris walks through what triage looks like in practice — including a four-question framework engineers can run in under two minutes. The episode closes the arc: precision is about being right; triage is about being appropriately right.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18866240-when-precision-is-the-wrong-tool.mp3" length="7261612" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-013-when-precision-is-the-wrong-tool/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18866240</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>602</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>decision triage, engineering leadership, rigor, reversibility, decision-making, team trust, implementation ownership, leadership mechanics</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Your Job Changed. Your Identity Didn’t.</itunes:title>
    <title>Your Job Changed. Your Identity Didn’t.</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Most engineers stepping into leadership already know what they should do differently. This episode is about why they don’t do it consistently — and it’s not a discipline problem. The solve-it reflex persists because identity updates on feedback, and the old feedback loop is faster, cleaner, and still running. Using a control systems analogy — a system with a long time constant competing against a faster parallel loop — Chris explains why the new identity keeps losing on response time. The epi...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Most engineers stepping into leadership already know what they should do differently. This episode is about why they don’t do it consistently — and it’s not a discipline problem. The solve-it reflex persists because identity updates on feedback, and the old feedback loop is faster, cleaner, and still running. Using a control systems analogy — a system with a long time constant competing against a faster parallel loop — Chris explains why the new identity keeps losing on response time. The episode closes with a single diagnostic question and one concrete action to start collecting the evidence the new identity actually needs.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most engineers stepping into leadership already know what they should do differently. This episode is about why they don’t do it consistently — and it’s not a discipline problem. The solve-it reflex persists because identity updates on feedback, and the old feedback loop is faster, cleaner, and still running. Using a control systems analogy — a system with a long time constant competing against a faster parallel loop — Chris explains why the new identity keeps losing on response time. The episode closes with a single diagnostic question and one concrete action to start collecting the evidence the new identity actually needs.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18827080-your-job-changed-your-identity-didn-t.mp3" length="6393002" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-012-your-job-changed-your-identity-didnt/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18827080</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>529</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>identity, leadership, feedback loops, control systems, engineering, coaching, role transition, behavior change, residual identity</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>The Conversation You&#39;ve Been Keeping Professional</itunes:title>
    <title>The Conversation You&#39;ve Been Keeping Professional</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Engineers don’t avoid performance conversations because they’re conflict-averse. They avoid them because they misclassify them as irreversible. They wait until the pattern is undeniable, the evidence is airtight, and the case is built - and by then the conversation has become a corrective action instead of a calibration. This episode names that as a decision error, applies the influence framework from Episode 10 to the hardest conversation most engineers keep delaying, and makes the case that...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Engineers don’t avoid performance conversations because they’re conflict-averse. They avoid them because they misclassify them as irreversible. They wait until the pattern is undeniable, the evidence is airtight, and the case is built - and by then the conversation has become a corrective action instead of a calibration. This episode names that as a decision error, applies the influence framework from Episode 10 to the hardest conversation most engineers keep delaying, and makes the case that the signal to act is when it still feels premature. Not when you’re sure.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers don’t avoid performance conversations because they’re conflict-averse. They avoid them because they misclassify them as irreversible. They wait until the pattern is undeniable, the evidence is airtight, and the case is built - and by then the conversation has become a corrective action instead of a calibration. This episode names that as a decision error, applies the influence framework from Episode 10 to the hardest conversation most engineers keep delaying, and makes the case that the signal to act is when it still feels premature. Not when you’re sure.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18786971-the-conversation-you-ve-been-keeping-professional.mp3" length="4857649" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-011-the-conversation-youve-been-keeping-professional/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18786971</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>401</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>performance conversations, early intervention, calibration, decision misclassification, influence, feedback timing, leadership, two-way doors, engineering leadership</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>What Influence Actually Requires</itunes:title>
    <title>What Influence Actually Requires</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Most engineers trying to create alignment are optimizing the output without understanding the inputs. This episode breaks influence down as a system with three inputs: sequencing context before conclusions, lowering the cost of dissent, and ensuring every exchange ends with clear movement. Using a controls engineering story that will feel familiar to anyone who’s ever run a pre-shutdown meeting, Chris unpacks why the same engineer, the same plan, and the same room can produce two completely d...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Most engineers trying to create alignment are optimizing the output without understanding the inputs. This episode breaks influence down as a system with three inputs: sequencing context before conclusions, lowering the cost of dissent, and ensuring every exchange ends with clear movement. Using a controls engineering story that will feel familiar to anyone who’s ever run a pre-shutdown meeting, Chris unpacks why the same engineer, the same plan, and the same room can produce two completely different outcomes  -  and why the difference isn’t persuasion skill. It’s system design </p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most engineers trying to create alignment are optimizing the output without understanding the inputs. This episode breaks influence down as a system with three inputs: sequencing context before conclusions, lowering the cost of dissent, and ensuring every exchange ends with clear movement. Using a controls engineering story that will feel familiar to anyone who’s ever run a pre-shutdown meeting, Chris unpacks why the same engineer, the same plan, and the same room can produce two completely different outcomes  -  and why the difference isn’t persuasion skill. It’s system design </p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18744393-what-influence-actually-requires.mp3" length="6641569" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-010-what-influence-actually-requires/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18744393</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>550</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>influence, system design, communication, decision-making, sequencing, cost of dissent, alignment, organizational behavior, leadership</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>How Engineers Sabotage Their Own Leadership</itunes:title>
    <title>How Engineers Sabotage Their Own Leadership</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk explores the challenges engineers face when transitioning into leadership roles, particularly the pitfalls of over-relying on logic. He emphasizes that while correctness is crucial in engineering, leadership requires a different approach that values influence, trust, and emotional intelligence. Stasiuk discusses how this disconnect can lead to ineffective leadership, where compliance replaces commitment, and teams feel disengaged. He encourages leaders to r...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk explores the challenges engineers face when transitioning into leadership roles, particularly the pitfalls of over-relying on logic. He emphasizes that while correctness is crucial in engineering, leadership requires a different approach that values influence, trust, and emotional intelligence. Stasiuk discusses how this disconnect can lead to ineffective leadership, where compliance replaces commitment, and teams feel disengaged. He encourages leaders to reflect on their reliance on logic and consider how to foster genuine alignment and ownership within their teams.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk explores the challenges engineers face when transitioning into leadership roles, particularly the pitfalls of over-relying on logic. He emphasizes that while correctness is crucial in engineering, leadership requires a different approach that values influence, trust, and emotional intelligence. Stasiuk discusses how this disconnect can lead to ineffective leadership, where compliance replaces commitment, and teams feel disengaged. He encourages leaders to reflect on their reliance on logic and consider how to foster genuine alignment and ownership within their teams.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18697831-how-engineers-sabotage-their-own-leadership.mp3" length="7140637" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-009-engineers-sabotage-their-own-leadership/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18697831</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>592</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>leadership, engineering, influence, trust, alignment, emotional intelligence, decision-making, team dynamics, communication, autonomy</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Why Engineers Stall Decisions Without Realizing It</itunes:title>
    <title>Why Engineers Stall Decisions Without Realizing It</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Stasiuk discusses the challenges engineers face when transitioning into leadership roles, particularly around decision-making. He introduces the concept of 'decision stall,' where leaders hesitate to make decisions due to a desire for certainty. Stasiuk emphasizes the importance of recognizing the difference between one-way and two-way decisions, advocating for action and movement to gain clarity and build self-trust in leadership. Re:Engineered is a podcast for enginee...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Chris Stasiuk discusses the challenges engineers face when transitioning into leadership roles, particularly around decision-making. He introduces the concept of &apos;decision stall,&apos; where leaders hesitate to make decisions due to a desire for certainty. Stasiuk emphasizes the importance of recognizing the difference between one-way and two-way decisions, advocating for action and movement to gain clarity and build self-trust in leadership.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Chris Stasiuk discusses the challenges engineers face when transitioning into leadership roles, particularly around decision-making. He introduces the concept of &apos;decision stall,&apos; where leaders hesitate to make decisions due to a desire for certainty. Stasiuk emphasizes the importance of recognizing the difference between one-way and two-way decisions, advocating for action and movement to gain clarity and build self-trust in leadership.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18646977-why-engineers-stall-decisions-without-realizing-it.mp3" length="5687720" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-008-why-engineers-stall-decisions-without-realizing-it/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18646977</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>471</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>decision making, leadership, engineering, decision stall, two-way decisions, one-way decisions, self-trust, action, confidence, judgment</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>From Correctness to Judgment: Why Leadership Feels Harder Than Engineering</itunes:title>
    <title>From Correctness to Judgment: Why Leadership Feels Harder Than Engineering</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Summary In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk explores the transition from engineering to leadership, highlighting the fundamental differences in mindset and approach required. He discusses how engineers often struggle with self-trust and decision-making in leadership roles due to the shift from a focus on correctness to one of judgment and ambiguity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these dynamics to navigate leadership effectively and develop the necessary skills fo...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><b>Summary</b></p><p>In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk explores the transition from engineering to leadership, highlighting the fundamental differences in mindset and approach required. He discusses how engineers often struggle with self-trust and decision-making in leadership roles due to the shift from a focus on correctness to one of judgment and ambiguity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these dynamics to navigate leadership effectively and develop the necessary skills for success.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Summary</b></p><p>In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk explores the transition from engineering to leadership, highlighting the fundamental differences in mindset and approach required. He discusses how engineers often struggle with self-trust and decision-making in leadership roles due to the shift from a focus on correctness to one of judgment and ambiguity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these dynamics to navigate leadership effectively and develop the necessary skills for success.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18608594-from-correctness-to-judgment-why-leadership-feels-harder-than-engineering.mp3" length="7922491" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-007-from-correctness-to-judgment-why-leadership-feels-harder-than-engineering/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18608594</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>657</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>engineering leadership, self-trust, judgment, uncertainty, decision-making, leadership dynamics, technical work, feedback loops, ambiguity, personal growth</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Why Engineers Struggle to Trust Themselves in Leadership</itunes:title>
    <title>Why Engineers Struggle to Trust Themselves in Leadership</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Summary In this episode, Chris Stasiuk explores the transition engineers face when stepping into leadership roles, highlighting the common feelings of uncertainty and self-doubt that arise. He emphasizes the distinction between confidence and self-trust, explaining how engineers often rely on external validation and struggle with judgment in ambiguous situations. The conversation delves into the importance of making decisions and learning from outcomes to rebuild self-trust, ultimately framin...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><b>Summary</b></p><p>In this episode, Chris Stasiuk explores the transition engineers face when stepping into leadership roles, highlighting the common feelings of uncertainty and self-doubt that arise. He emphasizes the distinction between confidence and self-trust, explaining how engineers often rely on external validation and struggle with judgment in ambiguous situations. The conversation delves into the importance of making decisions and learning from outcomes to rebuild self-trust, ultimately framing leadership as a skill that requires practice and internal validation.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Summary</b></p><p>In this episode, Chris Stasiuk explores the transition engineers face when stepping into leadership roles, highlighting the common feelings of uncertainty and self-doubt that arise. He emphasizes the distinction between confidence and self-trust, explaining how engineers often rely on external validation and struggle with judgment in ambiguous situations. The conversation delves into the importance of making decisions and learning from outcomes to rebuild self-trust, ultimately framing leadership as a skill that requires practice and internal validation.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18569217-why-engineers-struggle-to-trust-themselves-in-leadership.mp3" length="5518458" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-006-why-engineers-struggle-to-trust-themselves-in-leadership/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18569217</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>456</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>engineering, leadership, self-trust, judgment, uncertainty, decision-making, confidence, competence, personal development, career growth</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Why Smart People Stay Stuck Longer Than They Should</itunes:title>
    <title>Why Smart People Stay Stuck Longer Than They Should</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[This conversation explores the challenges engineers face when performance becomes the primary strategy, leading to feelings of frustration and misalignment. It discusses how engineers often rationalize staying in roles that drain them, reframing discomfort as duty and fatigue as commitment. The dialogue emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between endurance and alignment in one's career, and the need for self-trust in leadership roles. The episode concludes with a teaser for the next d...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>This conversation explores the challenges engineers face when performance becomes the primary strategy, leading to feelings of frustration and misalignment. It discusses how engineers often rationalize staying in roles that drain them, reframing discomfort as duty and fatigue as commitment. The dialogue emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between endurance and alignment in one&apos;s career, and the need for self-trust in leadership roles. The episode concludes with a teaser for the next discussion on trust issues among capable engineers.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This conversation explores the challenges engineers face when performance becomes the primary strategy, leading to feelings of frustration and misalignment. It discusses how engineers often rationalize staying in roles that drain them, reframing discomfort as duty and fatigue as commitment. The dialogue emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between endurance and alignment in one&apos;s career, and the need for self-trust in leadership roles. The episode concludes with a teaser for the next discussion on trust issues among capable engineers.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18537046-why-smart-people-stay-stuck-longer-than-they-should.mp3" length="4922230" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-005-why-smart-people-stay-stuck-longer-than-they-should/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18537046</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>407</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>engineering, performance, leadership, trust, self-judgment, burnout, alignment, responsibility, agency, career growth</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>When Being Indispensable Becomes a Trap</itunes:title>
    <title>When Being Indispensable Becomes a Trap</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk discusses the challenges engineers face when their performance becomes their primary strategy. He highlights how high performers can unintentionally become bottlenecks in their organizations and the importance of shifting from being an expert to a leader. The discussion emphasizes the need for engineers to build capabilities in others rather than solving problems themselves, ultimately leading to a more effective and sustainable work environment. Re:Enginee...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk discusses the challenges engineers face when their performance becomes their primary strategy. He highlights how high performers can unintentionally become bottlenecks in their organizations and the importance of shifting from being an expert to a leader. The discussion emphasizes the need for engineers to build capabilities in others rather than solving problems themselves, ultimately leading to a more effective and sustainable work environment.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk discusses the challenges engineers face when their performance becomes their primary strategy. He highlights how high performers can unintentionally become bottlenecks in their organizations and the importance of shifting from being an expert to a leader. The discussion emphasizes the need for engineers to build capabilities in others rather than solving problems themselves, ultimately leading to a more effective and sustainable work environment.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18491135-when-being-indispensable-becomes-a-trap.mp3" length="4362544" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-004-when-being-indispensable-becomes-a-trap/</link>
    <itunes:image href="https://storage.buzzsprout.com/yz91ugczcumgo3r0sdwewkm1psfc?.jpg" />
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">373f204d-93fb-4d40-b314-d7c0bd1cdabe</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 21:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>382</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>engineering, leadership, performance, collaboration, bottleneck, problem-solving, coaching, delegation, system optimization, career growth</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Why Certainty Might Be Killing Your Credibility</itunes:title>
    <title>Why Certainty Might Be Killing Your Credibility</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk explores the challenges engineers face regarding certainty and communication as they progress in their careers. He discusses how early in their careers, engineers are rewarded for being decisive and having strong opinions, but as they advance, the nature of problems becomes more complex and involves collaboration. Stasiuk emphasizes the importance of leading with reasoning rather than conclusions to foster trust and engagement in discussions. He also touche...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk explores the challenges engineers face regarding certainty and communication as they progress in their careers. He discusses how early in their careers, engineers are rewarded for being decisive and having strong opinions, but as they advance, the nature of problems becomes more complex and involves collaboration. Stasiuk emphasizes the importance of leading with reasoning rather than conclusions to foster trust and engagement in discussions. He also touches on the pitfalls of becoming indispensable and how it can lead to a performance trap.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, Chris Stasiuk explores the challenges engineers face regarding certainty and communication as they progress in their careers. He discusses how early in their careers, engineers are rewarded for being decisive and having strong opinions, but as they advance, the nature of problems becomes more complex and involves collaboration. Stasiuk emphasizes the importance of leading with reasoning rather than conclusions to foster trust and engagement in discussions. He also touches on the pitfalls of becoming indispensable and how it can lead to a performance trap.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18491136-why-certainty-might-be-killing-your-credibility.mp3" length="3814792" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-003-why-certainty-might-be-killing-your-credibility/</link>
    <itunes:image href="https://storage.buzzsprout.com/zc2oroje0crmcgr4snez9183n6as?.jpg" />
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">c67170e1-6a56-4dcd-8508-fbd6c46d4daa</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 20:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>329</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>engineering, leadership, certainty, communication, credibility, decision-making, influence, performance, teamwork, problem-solving</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Why I Can’t See What You See</itunes:title>
    <title>Why I Can’t See What You See</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Stasiuk explores the often-overlooked skills of engineers and the cognitive blind spots that prevent them from recognizing their own expertise. He emphasizes the importance of gaining visibility into one's skills and how this can impact professional development and communication. The conversation provides actionable insights for engineers to better understand their value and advocate for themselves in the workplace. Re:Engineered is a podcast for engineers and technical...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Chris Stasiuk explores the often-overlooked skills of engineers and the cognitive blind spots that prevent them from recognizing their own expertise. He emphasizes the importance of gaining visibility into one&apos;s skills and how this can impact professional development and communication. The conversation provides actionable insights for engineers to better understand their value and advocate for themselves in the workplace.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Chris Stasiuk explores the often-overlooked skills of engineers and the cognitive blind spots that prevent them from recognizing their own expertise. He emphasizes the importance of gaining visibility into one&apos;s skills and how this can impact professional development and communication. The conversation provides actionable insights for engineers to better understand their value and advocate for themselves in the workplace.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18491167-why-i-can-t-see-what-you-see.mp3" length="5473890" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-002-why-i-cant-see-what-you-see/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18491167</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 19:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>453</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>engineering, self-awareness, skills, cognitive blind spots, professional development, communication, leadership, visibility, expertise, trust</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Welcome to Re:Engineered</itunes:title>
    <title>Welcome to Re:Engineered</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the inaugural episode of the Re:Engineered Podcast, Chris Stasiuk introduces himself and the purpose of the podcast, which is to explore the human side of engineering. He shares his journey from a technical engineer to a leader and coach, emphasizing the importance of communication, leadership, and self-awareness skills that engineers often lack. Through personal anecdotes, he highlights the gap in traditional engineering education regarding interpersonal skills and the need for engineers ...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>In the inaugural episode of the Re:Engineered Podcast, Chris Stasiuk introduces himself and the purpose of the podcast, which is to explore the human side of engineering. He shares his journey from a technical engineer to a leader and coach, emphasizing the importance of communication, leadership, and self-awareness skills that engineers often lack. Through personal anecdotes, he highlights the gap in traditional engineering education regarding interpersonal skills and the need for engineers to grow beyond technical expertise.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the inaugural episode of the Re:Engineered Podcast, Chris Stasiuk introduces himself and the purpose of the podcast, which is to explore the human side of engineering. He shares his journey from a technical engineer to a leader and coach, emphasizing the importance of communication, leadership, and self-awareness skills that engineers often lack. Through personal anecdotes, he highlights the gap in traditional engineering education regarding interpersonal skills and the need for engineers to grow beyond technical expertise.</p><p><b>Re:Engineered</b> is a podcast for engineers and technical professionals navigating the shift from technical excellence to leadership responsibility.</p><p>Hosted by <b>Chris Stasiuk</b>, a professional engineer with over 25 years in engineering consulting and leadership roles, the show treats leadership, communication, and decision-making as systems to understand — not personality traits to fake. No buzzwords. No corporate theater. Just clear thinking about how technical people actually lead.</p><p>Explore episodes, transcripts, and related resources at <b>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/</b>.</p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2572479/episodes/18491149-welcome-to-re-engineered.mp3" length="4204644" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://chrisstasiuk.com/podcast/episode-001-welcome-to-reengineered/</link>
    <itunes:author>Chris Stasiuk</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18491149</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 18:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>347</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>engineering, self-awareness, skills, cognitive blind spots, professional development, communication, leadership, visibility, expertise, trust</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
