<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://rss.buzzsprout.com/styles.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <atom:link href="https://rss.buzzsprout.com/2068323.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
  <atom:link href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
  <title>11KBW Employment Podcast</title>

  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:05:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
  <link>https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323</link>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>© 2026 11KBW Employment Podcast</copyright>
  <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <podcast:guid>55d6887e-29a0-5e93-93a3-e59c30d6833e</podcast:guid>
  <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
  <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
  <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  <description><![CDATA[Barristers from the UK’s leading employment law chambers chat about a recent case.]]></description>
  <generator>Buzzsprout (https://www.buzzsprout.com)</generator>
  <itunes:owner>
    <itunes:name>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:name>
  </itunes:owner>
  
  <itunes:image href="https://storage.buzzsprout.com/grgwcs3zsdwthw5tcihf8ypgbklu?.jpg" />
  <itunes:category text="Education" />
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Peggie, Kelly, Darlington and beyond: Single sex spaces at work</itunes:title>
    <title>Peggie, Kelly, Darlington and beyond: Single sex spaces at work</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this extended special edition episode, Dan Stilitz KC and Katherine Taunton explore the difficult recent case law on single sex spaces in the workplace: Kelly v Leonardo UK Ltd; Peggie v Fife Health Board and Upton; Hutchinson &amp; others v County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust; and R. (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Equality and Human Rights Commission [2026] EWHC 279. How did the Tribunal panels analyse the issues in these cases differently?  What guidanc...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this extended special edition episode, Dan Stilitz KC and Katherine Taunton explore the difficult recent case law on single sex spaces in the workplace: Kelly v Leonardo UK Ltd; Peggie v Fife Health Board and Upton; Hutchinson &amp; others v County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust; and R. (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Equality and Human Rights Commission [2026] EWHC 279. How did the Tribunal panels analyse the issues in these cases differently?  What guidance can employers take from them? What light does the High Court’s recent judgment shed on these difficult issues? </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this extended special edition episode, Dan Stilitz KC and Katherine Taunton explore the difficult recent case law on single sex spaces in the workplace: Kelly v Leonardo UK Ltd; Peggie v Fife Health Board and Upton; Hutchinson &amp; others v County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust; and R. (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Equality and Human Rights Commission [2026] EWHC 279. How did the Tribunal panels analyse the issues in these cases differently?  What guidance can employers take from them? What light does the High Court’s recent judgment shed on these difficult issues? </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/18867198-peggie-kelly-darlington-and-beyond-single-sex-spaces-at-work.mp3" length="57339976" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18867198</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>4774</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Acceptable in the 80s: special historical edition</itunes:title>
    <title>Acceptable in the 80s: special historical edition</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Christopher Jeans KC regales Sean Jones KC with tales of employment law across the decades, in a special episode to celebrate the publication of the 40th edition of the Tolley’s Employment Handbook. How have things changed in the ET since 1978?   ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Jeans KC regales Sean Jones KC with tales of employment law across the decades, in a special episode to celebrate the publication of the 40th edition of the Tolley’s Employment Handbook. How have things changed in the ET since 1978?</p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Jeans KC regales Sean Jones KC with tales of employment law across the decades, in a special episode to celebrate the publication of the 40th edition of the Tolley’s Employment Handbook. How have things changed in the ET since 1978?</p><p><br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/18595059-acceptable-in-the-80s-special-historical-edition.mp3" length="25978098" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</link>
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18595059</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>2160</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>DBP v Scottish Ambulance Service: Anonymity</itunes:title>
    <title>DBP v Scottish Ambulance Service: Anonymity</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Peter Lockley and Michael White discuss recent developments in anonymity in DBP v Scottish Ambulance Service [2025] EAT 147. Can anonymity be granted even after there has been a full open hearing? Are ETs and the EAT giving applicants for anonymity an easier ride than they used to?  ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Peter Lockley and Michael White discuss recent developments in anonymity in DBP v Scottish Ambulance Service [2025] EAT 147. Can anonymity be granted even after there has been a full open hearing? Are ETs and the EAT giving applicants for anonymity an easier ride than they used to? </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Lockley and Michael White discuss recent developments in anonymity in DBP v Scottish Ambulance Service [2025] EAT 147. Can anonymity be granted even after there has been a full open hearing? Are ETs and the EAT giving applicants for anonymity an easier ride than they used to? </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/18370093-dbp-v-scottish-ambulance-service-anonymity.mp3" length="16229626" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <link>https://www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</link>
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18370093</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1348</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Wicked Vision: Whistle Blowing Dismissals</itunes:title>
    <title>Wicked Vision: Whistle Blowing Dismissals</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Seán Jones KC and Oliver Mills discuss the Rice v Wicked Vision Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1466. When can a whistleblowing claimant claim their dismissal was a detriment? Now the Court of Appeal has its say in this blockbuster whistleblowing case. Will this end up in the Supreme Court, and what will the Justices make of it?  ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Seán Jones KC and Oliver Mills discuss the Rice v Wicked Vision Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1466. When can a whistleblowing claimant claim their dismissal was a detriment? Now the Court of Appeal has its say in this blockbuster whistleblowing case. Will this end up in the Supreme Court, and what will the Justices make of it? </p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seán Jones KC and Oliver Mills discuss the Rice v Wicked Vision Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1466. When can a whistleblowing claimant claim their dismissal was a detriment? Now the Court of Appeal has its say in this blockbuster whistleblowing case. Will this end up in the Supreme Court, and what will the Justices make of it? </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/18266072-wicked-vision-whistle-blowing-dismissals.mp3" length="19391587" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18266072</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1611</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>#UKemplaw #11KBW #11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Szucs: Abuse of Process  </itunes:title>
    <title>Szucs: Abuse of Process  </title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Judy Stone KC and new tenant Jack Steele discuss strike outs for abuse of process in Szucs v GreenSquareAccord Ltd [2025] EAT 110. What does it take to strike out a claim as an abuse? When does the rule in Henderson v Henderson apply? How should employment lawyers navigate abuse arguments in practice? Host: Jack Steele Guest: Judy Stone KC www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw   ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Judy Stone KC and new tenant Jack Steele discuss strike outs for abuse of process in <em>Szucs v GreenSquareAccord Ltd</em> [2025] EAT 110. What does it take to strike out a claim as an abuse? When does the rule in Henderson v Henderson apply? How should employment lawyers navigate abuse arguments in practice?</p><p>Host: Jack Steele</p><p>Guest: Judy Stone KC</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy Stone KC and new tenant Jack Steele discuss strike outs for abuse of process in <em>Szucs v GreenSquareAccord Ltd</em> [2025] EAT 110. What does it take to strike out a claim as an abuse? When does the rule in Henderson v Henderson apply? How should employment lawyers navigate abuse arguments in practice?</p><p>Host: Jack Steele</p><p>Guest: Judy Stone KC</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/18110045-szucs-abuse-of-process.mp3" length="14525883" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-18110045</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1206</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Melki: Time Limits in the EAT</itunes:title>
    <title>Melki: Time Limits in the EAT</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Dan Stilitz KC talks to new tenant Ishaani Shrivastava about the approach to time limits in Melki v Bouygues [2025] EWCA Civ 585. When will an error when filing an appeal in the EAT cause the appeal to be out of time? Host: Ishaani Shrivastava Guest: Daniel Stilitz KC www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Dan Stilitz KC talks to new tenant Ishaani Shrivastava about the approach to time limits in <em>Melki v Bouygues </em>[2025] EWCA Civ 585. When will an error when filing an appeal in the EAT cause the appeal to be out of time?</p><p>Host: Ishaani Shrivastava</p><p>Guest: Daniel Stilitz KC</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Stilitz KC talks to new tenant Ishaani Shrivastava about the approach to time limits in <em>Melki v Bouygues </em>[2025] EWCA Civ 585. When will an error when filing an appeal in the EAT cause the appeal to be out of time?</p><p>Host: Ishaani Shrivastava</p><p>Guest: Daniel Stilitz KC</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/17922793-melki-time-limits-in-the-eat.mp3" length="15789800" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-17922793</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 14:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1311</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Pråhl v Lapsinki: International Jurisdiction of the ET</itunes:title>
    <title>Pråhl v Lapsinki: International Jurisdiction of the ET</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Daniel Isenberg and Samuel Willis discuss international jurisdiction in the ET post-Brexit in Pråhl v Lapsinki [2025] EAT 77. When will territorial jurisdiction confer international jurisdiction? Is it necessary to apply to the High Court before serving ET claims outside the jurisdiction? And what is the continuing relevance of EU law in this area after Brexit? ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Isenberg and Samuel Willis discuss international jurisdiction in the ET post-Brexit in <em>Pråhl v</em> <em>Lapsinki </em>[2025] EAT 77. When will territorial jurisdiction confer international jurisdiction? Is it necessary to apply to the High Court before serving ET claims outside the jurisdiction? And what is the continuing relevance of EU law in this area after Brexit?</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Isenberg and Samuel Willis discuss international jurisdiction in the ET post-Brexit in <em>Pråhl v</em> <em>Lapsinki </em>[2025] EAT 77. When will territorial jurisdiction confer international jurisdiction? Is it necessary to apply to the High Court before serving ET claims outside the jurisdiction? And what is the continuing relevance of EU law in this area after Brexit?</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/17749061-prahl-v-lapsinki-international-jurisdiction-of-the-et.mp3" length="23851342" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-17749061</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1983</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Ayinde: The Perils of AI</itunes:title>
    <title>Ayinde: The Perils of AI</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Edge talks to Leo Davidson about Ayinde v LB Haringey [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin), in which the President of the King’s Bench Division and Mr Justice Johnson considered whether to initiate  contempt of court proceedings against lawyers after the citation of fake cases generated by AI.  A cautionary tale for lawyers, as well as those instructing and supervising them. Host: Leo Davidson Guest: Andrew Edge www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Edge talks to Leo Davidson about <em>Ayinde v LB Haringey </em>[2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin), in which the President of the King’s Bench Division and Mr Justice Johnson considered whether to initiate  contempt of court proceedings against lawyers after the citation of fake cases generated by AI.  A cautionary tale for lawyers, as well as those instructing and supervising them.</p><p>Host: Leo Davidson</p><p>Guest: Andrew Edge</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Edge talks to Leo Davidson about <em>Ayinde v LB Haringey </em>[2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin), in which the President of the King’s Bench Division and Mr Justice Johnson considered whether to initiate  contempt of court proceedings against lawyers after the citation of fake cases generated by AI.  A cautionary tale for lawyers, as well as those instructing and supervising them.</p><p>Host: Leo Davidson</p><p>Guest: Andrew Edge</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/17552338-ayinde-the-perils-of-ai.mp3" length="30609302" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-17552338</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 17:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>2546</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Fasano v Reckitt Benckiser: Group Companies and the Equality Act</itunes:title>
    <title>Fasano v Reckitt Benckiser: Group Companies and the Equality Act</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Mike Lee talks to Katherine Taunton about Fasano v Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc [2025] EWCA Civ 592, in which the Court of Appeal shines a light on the principles governing the liability of group companies as agents under the Equality Act.  When and how will a group company be liable for the acts of another company in the group? Host: Katherine Taunton Guest: Mike Lee  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Mike Lee talks to Katherine Taunton about Fasano v Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc [2025] EWCA Civ 592, in which the Court of Appeal shines a light on the principles governing the liability of group companies as agents under the Equality Act.  When and how will a group company be liable for the acts of another company in the group?</p><p>Host: Katherine Taunton<br/>Guest: Mike Lee<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Lee talks to Katherine Taunton about Fasano v Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc [2025] EWCA Civ 592, in which the Court of Appeal shines a light on the principles governing the liability of group companies as agents under the Equality Act.  When and how will a group company be liable for the acts of another company in the group?</p><p>Host: Katherine Taunton<br/>Guest: Mike Lee<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/17395804-fasano-v-reckitt-benckiser-group-companies-and-the-equality-act.mp3" length="12842196" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-17395804</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1065</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Sullivan v Isle of Wight - Applicant Whistleblowers</itunes:title>
    <title>Sullivan v Isle of Wight - Applicant Whistleblowers</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Oliver Jackson talks to Aliya Al-Yassin about Sullivan v Isle of Wight Council [2025] EWCA Civ 379, the Court of Appeal’s important decision that, outside of the NHS, external job applicants cannot bring whistleblowing claims. Why can’t external job applicants bring whistleblowing claims? Is being a job applicant a ‘status’ for the purposes of Article 14 of the ECHR? What counts as a detriment in the whistleblowing legislation? Host: Aliya Al-Yassin Guest: Oliver Jackson  www.11kbw.com/practi...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Oliver Jackson talks to Aliya Al-Yassin about Sullivan v Isle of Wight Council [2025] EWCA Civ 379, the Court of Appeal’s important decision that, outside of the NHS, external job applicants cannot bring whistleblowing claims. Why can’t external job applicants bring whistleblowing claims? Is being a job applicant a ‘status’ for the purposes of Article 14 of the ECHR? What counts as a detriment in the whistleblowing legislation?</p><p>Host: Aliya Al-Yassin<br/>Guest: Oliver Jackson<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver Jackson talks to Aliya Al-Yassin about Sullivan v Isle of Wight Council [2025] EWCA Civ 379, the Court of Appeal’s important decision that, outside of the NHS, external job applicants cannot bring whistleblowing claims. Why can’t external job applicants bring whistleblowing claims? Is being a job applicant a ‘status’ for the purposes of Article 14 of the ECHR? What counts as a detriment in the whistleblowing legislation?</p><p>Host: Aliya Al-Yassin<br/>Guest: Oliver Jackson<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/17066169-sullivan-v-isle-of-wight-applicant-whistleblowers.mp3" length="23228529" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-17066169</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1931</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Higgs v Farmor CA: Manifestation of Belief in the Court of Appeal</itunes:title>
    <title>Higgs v Farmor CA: Manifestation of Belief in the Court of Appeal</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this special extended episode, Andrew Edge and Hannah Slarks discuss the biggest employment judgment of 2025, Higgs v Farmor’s School [2025] EWCA Civ 109. Just days after the parties seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court, Andrew and Hannah take a deep dive into where discrimination law has gone wrong, and how the Supreme Court might fix it. Host: Hannah Slarks  Guest: Andrew Edge  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this special extended episode,<b> </b>Andrew Edge and Hannah Slarks discuss the biggest employment judgment of 2025, <em>Higgs v Farmor’s School</em> [2025] EWCA Civ 109. Just days after the parties seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court, Andrew and Hannah take a deep dive into where discrimination law has gone wrong, and how the Supreme Court might fix it.</p><p>Host: Hannah Slarks <br/>Guest: Andrew Edge<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this special extended episode,<b> </b>Andrew Edge and Hannah Slarks discuss the biggest employment judgment of 2025, <em>Higgs v Farmor’s School</em> [2025] EWCA Civ 109. Just days after the parties seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court, Andrew and Hannah take a deep dive into where discrimination law has gone wrong, and how the Supreme Court might fix it.</p><p>Host: Hannah Slarks <br/>Guest: Andrew Edge<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/16856248-higgs-v-farmor-ca-manifestation-of-belief-in-the-court-of-appeal.mp3" length="41792404" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-16856248</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>3478</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Syspal Capital v Truman: Leaver Provisions</itunes:title>
    <title>Syspal Capital v Truman: Leaver Provisions</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ruth Kennedy talks to Oliver Mills about Syspal Capital Ltd v Truman [2024] EWHC Civ 1561 (Ch). Why do employers use shareholding arrangements to incentivise employees? Why is it so important to draft Articles of Association carefully? What are the dangers of employers dismissing employees to deprive them of particular benefits?  Host: Oliver Mills Guest: Ruth Kennedy   www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw     ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Ruth Kennedy talks to Oliver Mills about Syspal Capital Ltd v Truman [2024] EWHC Civ 1561 (Ch). Why do employers use shareholding arrangements to incentivise employees? Why is it so important to draft Articles of Association carefully? What are the dangers of employers dismissing employees to deprive them of particular benefits? </p><p>Host: Oliver Mills<br/>Guest: Ruth Kennedy <br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruth Kennedy talks to Oliver Mills about Syspal Capital Ltd v Truman [2024] EWHC Civ 1561 (Ch). Why do employers use shareholding arrangements to incentivise employees? Why is it so important to draft Articles of Association carefully? What are the dangers of employers dismissing employees to deprive them of particular benefits? </p><p>Host: Oliver Mills<br/>Guest: Ruth Kennedy <br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/16698537-syspal-capital-v-truman-leaver-provisions.mp3" length="11556928" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-16698537</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>958</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Derma Med Ltd v Ally: Full and Frank Disclosure</itunes:title>
    <title>Derma Med Ltd v Ally: Full and Frank Disclosure</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Rupert Paines talks to Lucy Jones about Derma Med Ltd v Ally [2024] EWCA Civ 175, a Court of Appeal decision on non-compete and confidentiality injunctions, granted without notice.  Host: Lucy Jones Guest: Rupert Paines  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Paines talks to Lucy Jones about Derma Med Ltd v Ally [2024] EWCA Civ 175, a Court of Appeal decision on non-compete and confidentiality injunctions, granted without notice.<br/><br/>Host: Lucy Jones<br/>Guest: Rupert Paines<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Paines talks to Lucy Jones about Derma Med Ltd v Ally [2024] EWCA Civ 175, a Court of Appeal decision on non-compete and confidentiality injunctions, granted without notice.<br/><br/>Host: Lucy Jones<br/>Guest: Rupert Paines<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/16533142-derma-med-ltd-v-ally-full-and-frank-disclosure.mp3" length="29126324" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-16533142</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>2422</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Cheshire Estate v Blanchfield: Fiduciary Duties</itunes:title>
    <title>Cheshire Estate v Blanchfield: Fiduciary Duties</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jamie Susskind talks to Rita Dias about Cheshire Estate &amp; Legal Ltd v Blanchfield [2024] EWCA Civ 1317.  When will directors taking steps towards setting up a competitor breach fiduciary duties?  Host: Rita Dias Guest: Jamie Susskind  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Jamie Susskind talks to Rita Dias about Cheshire Estate &amp; Legal Ltd v Blanchfield [2024] EWCA Civ 1317.  When will directors taking steps towards setting up a competitor breach fiduciary duties?<br/><br/>Host: Rita Dias<br/>Guest: Jamie Susskind<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie Susskind talks to Rita Dias about Cheshire Estate &amp; Legal Ltd v Blanchfield [2024] EWCA Civ 1317.  When will directors taking steps towards setting up a competitor breach fiduciary duties?<br/><br/>Host: Rita Dias<br/>Guest: Jamie Susskind<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/16300063-cheshire-estate-v-blanchfield-fiduciary-duties.mp3" length="17820424" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-16300063</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1480</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Dowding v Character Group: Tribunal Costs</itunes:title>
    <title>Dowding v Character Group: Tribunal Costs</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tom Ogg speaks to Michael White about Dowding v The Character Group plc [2024] EAT 153, a case which touches on the most common questions relating to costs in the Tribunal.  How should a Tribunal assess whether a claim had no reasonable prospect of success?  What kind of conduct is ‘unreasonable’ such that costs should be awarded – including in relation to the refusal of settlement offers?  How should Tribunals decide upon the amount of a costs award?  And in what circumst...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Tom Ogg speaks to Michael White about Dowding v The Character Group plc [2024] EAT 153, a case which touches on the most common questions relating to costs in the Tribunal.  How should a Tribunal assess whether a claim had no reasonable prospect of success?  What kind of conduct is ‘unreasonable’ such that costs should be awarded – including in relation to the refusal of settlement offers?  How should Tribunals decide upon the amount of a costs award?  And in what circumstances should ‘indemnity’ costs be awarded?<br/><br/>Host: Michael White<br/>Guest: Tom Ogg<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Ogg speaks to Michael White about Dowding v The Character Group plc [2024] EAT 153, a case which touches on the most common questions relating to costs in the Tribunal.  How should a Tribunal assess whether a claim had no reasonable prospect of success?  What kind of conduct is ‘unreasonable’ such that costs should be awarded – including in relation to the refusal of settlement offers?  How should Tribunals decide upon the amount of a costs award?  And in what circumstances should ‘indemnity’ costs be awarded?<br/><br/>Host: Michael White<br/>Guest: Tom Ogg<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/16168812-dowding-v-character-group-tribunal-costs.mp3" length="20604020" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-16168812</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1712</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>First Greater Western v Moussa: Knowledge in Whistleblowing and Victimisation Claims</itunes:title>
    <title>First Greater Western v Moussa: Knowledge in Whistleblowing and Victimisation Claims</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[This month Judy Stone KC talks to Joseph Lavery about First Greater Western Ltd v Moussa [2024] EAT 82.  When can an employer be liable for detriments inflicted by a decision maker who has no knowledge of the protected disclosure or protected act? What is a collective memory? They discuss this important judgement from the EAT and the difficulty of reconciling the case law in this area.    Host: Joseph Lavery Guest: Judy Stone KC  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>This month Judy Stone KC talks to Joseph Lavery about First Greater Western Ltd v Moussa [2024] EAT 82.  When can an employer be liable for detriments inflicted by a decision maker who has no knowledge of the protected disclosure or protected act? What is a collective memory? They discuss this important judgement from the EAT and the difficulty of reconciling the case law in this area.  <br/><br/>Host: Joseph Lavery<br/>Guest: Judy Stone KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This month Judy Stone KC talks to Joseph Lavery about First Greater Western Ltd v Moussa [2024] EAT 82.  When can an employer be liable for detriments inflicted by a decision maker who has no knowledge of the protected disclosure or protected act? What is a collective memory? They discuss this important judgement from the EAT and the difficulty of reconciling the case law in this area.  <br/><br/>Host: Joseph Lavery<br/>Guest: Judy Stone KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/16005530-first-greater-western-v-moussa-knowledge-in-whistleblowing-and-victimisation-claims.mp3" length="15782130" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-16005530</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1310</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Tesco v USDAW: Fire and Rehire</itunes:title>
    <title>Tesco v USDAW: Fire and Rehire</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[This month Sean Jones KC is back to talk to Aliya Al-Yassin about Tesco v USDAW [2024] UKSC 28.  When will an implied term prevent an employer from firing and rehiring? And when will an injunction be granted to restrain dismissal? They discuss this landmark Supreme Court judgment.  Host: Aliya Al-Yassin Guest: Sean Jones KC  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>This month Sean Jones KC is back to talk to Aliya Al-Yassin about Tesco v USDAW [2024] UKSC 28.  When will an implied term prevent an employer from firing and rehiring? And when will an injunction be granted to restrain dismissal? They discuss this landmark Supreme Court judgment.<br/><br/>Host: Aliya Al-Yassin<br/>Guest: Sean Jones KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This month Sean Jones KC is back to talk to Aliya Al-Yassin about Tesco v USDAW [2024] UKSC 28.  When will an implied term prevent an employer from firing and rehiring? And when will an injunction be granted to restrain dismissal? They discuss this landmark Supreme Court judgment.<br/><br/>Host: Aliya Al-Yassin<br/>Guest: Sean Jones KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/15812391-tesco-v-usdaw-fire-and-rehire.mp3" length="21882326" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-15812391</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1819</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Bailey v Stonewall: Causing and Inducing Discrimination</itunes:title>
    <title>Bailey v Stonewall: Causing and Inducing Discrimination</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[This month Daniel Isenberg talks to Oliver Mills about Bailey v Stonewall Equality Ltd [2024] EAT 119.  When will a third party be liable for instructing, inducing or causing someone else’s act of discrimination?  They discuss this important new judgment from Mr Justice Bourne on the application of s.111 Equality Act 2010.  Host: Oliver Milla Guest: Daniel Isenberg  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>This month Daniel Isenberg talks to Oliver Mills about Bailey v Stonewall Equality Ltd [2024] EAT 119.  When will a third party be liable for instructing, inducing or causing someone else’s act of discrimination?  They discuss this important new judgment from Mr Justice Bourne on the application of s.111 Equality Act 2010.<br/><br/>Host: Oliver Milla<br/>Guest: Daniel Isenberg<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This month Daniel Isenberg talks to Oliver Mills about Bailey v Stonewall Equality Ltd [2024] EAT 119.  When will a third party be liable for instructing, inducing or causing someone else’s act of discrimination?  They discuss this important new judgment from Mr Justice Bourne on the application of s.111 Equality Act 2010.<br/><br/>Host: Oliver Milla<br/>Guest: Daniel Isenberg<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/15657677-bailey-v-stonewall-causing-and-inducing-discrimination.mp3" length="22758210" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-15657677</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 17:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1892</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Adams v Walsall Housing: Bypassing Collecting Bargaining</itunes:title>
    <title>Adams v Walsall Housing: Bypassing Collecting Bargaining</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Richard Leiper KC talks to Paddy Halliday about their case, Adams v Walsall Housing Group Ltd.  When will offers be unlawful  because they have bypassed a collective bargaining process?  Host: Paddy Halliday Guest: Richard Leiper KC  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Richard Leiper KC talks to Paddy Halliday about their case, Adams v Walsall Housing Group Ltd.  When will offers be unlawful  because they have bypassed a collective bargaining process?<br/><br/>Host: Paddy Halliday<br/>Guest: Richard Leiper KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Leiper KC talks to Paddy Halliday about their case, Adams v Walsall Housing Group Ltd.  When will offers be unlawful  because they have bypassed a collective bargaining process?<br/><br/>Host: Paddy Halliday<br/>Guest: Richard Leiper KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/15451924-adams-v-walsall-housing-bypassing-collecting-bargaining.mp3" length="14530894" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-15451924</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1206</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Wicked Vision: Whistleblowing Detriment</itunes:title>
    <title>Wicked Vision: Whistleblowing Detriment</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Mike Lee talks to Katherine Taunton about Wicked Vision Ltd v Rice [2024] EAT 29.  When can a whistleblowing claimant claim that their dismissal was a detriment? They discuss the strategic implications of the EAT’s decision, and the potential for future debate about whether it is consistent with the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Osipov v Timis.  Host: Katherine Taunton Guest: Mike Lee  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Mike Lee talks to Katherine Taunton about Wicked Vision Ltd v Rice [2024] EAT 29.  When can a whistleblowing claimant claim that their dismissal was a detriment? They discuss the strategic implications of the EAT’s decision, and the potential for future debate about whether it is consistent with the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Osipov v Timis.<br/><br/>Host: Katherine Taunton<br/>Guest: Mike Lee<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Lee talks to Katherine Taunton about Wicked Vision Ltd v Rice [2024] EAT 29.  When can a whistleblowing claimant claim that their dismissal was a detriment? They discuss the strategic implications of the EAT’s decision, and the potential for future debate about whether it is consistent with the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Osipov v Timis.<br/><br/>Host: Katherine Taunton<br/>Guest: Mike Lee<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/15317082-wicked-vision-whistleblowing-detriment.mp3" length="12465356" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-15317082</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1034</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Employment Litigation in the Middle East</itunes:title>
    <title>Employment Litigation in the Middle East</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Amy Rogers KC talks to Tom Ogg about litigating in the Middle East.  What principles and procedure apply to employment litigation in the Middle East?  Host: Tom Ogg Guest: Amy Rogers KC  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Amy Rogers KC talks to Tom Ogg about litigating in the Middle East.  What principles and procedure apply to employment litigation in the Middle East?<br/><br/>Host: Tom Ogg<br/>Guest: Amy Rogers KC</p><p><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy Rogers KC talks to Tom Ogg about litigating in the Middle East.  What principles and procedure apply to employment litigation in the Middle East?<br/><br/>Host: Tom Ogg<br/>Guest: Amy Rogers KC</p><p><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/15143314-employment-litigation-in-the-middle-east.mp3" length="15047840" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-15143314</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 15:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1249</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>#UKemploymentlaw, #11KBW, #11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Omar v Epping: Heat of the Moment</itunes:title>
    <title>Omar v Epping: Heat of the Moment</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Smith talks to Aileen McColgan KC about Omar v Epping Forest [2024] ICR 301.  When will words used in the heat of the moment lead to an effective dismissal or resignation?  This new judgment provides helpful guidance.  Host: Aileen McColgan KC Guest: Andrew Smith  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Smith talks to Aileen McColgan KC about Omar v Epping Forest [2024] ICR 301.  When will words used in the heat of the moment lead to an effective dismissal or resignation?  This new judgment provides helpful guidance.<br/><br/>Host: Aileen McColgan KC<br/>Guest: Andrew Smith<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Smith talks to Aileen McColgan KC about Omar v Epping Forest [2024] ICR 301.  When will words used in the heat of the moment lead to an effective dismissal or resignation?  This new judgment provides helpful guidance.<br/><br/>Host: Aileen McColgan KC<br/>Guest: Andrew Smith<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/14939835-omar-v-epping-heat-of-the-moment.mp3" length="22620619" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-14939835</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1880</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>The Silks Episode</itunes:title>
    <title>The Silks Episode</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Our three new employment silks - Amy Rogers KC, Judy Stone KC and Simon Forshaw KC - speak to Ruth Kennedy about a case from their final year as junior barristers.  They discuss team moves, post-employment restrictions, how solicitors can recover fees, and what they originally wanted to be when they grew up.  Host: Ruth Kennedy,  Guests: Amy Rogers KC, Judy Stone KC and Simon Forshaw KC  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Our three new employment silks - Amy Rogers KC, Judy Stone KC and Simon Forshaw KC - speak to Ruth Kennedy about a case from their final year as junior barristers.  They discuss team moves, post-employment restrictions, how solicitors can recover fees, and what they originally wanted to be when they grew up.<br/><br/>Host: Ruth Kennedy, <br/>Guests: Amy Rogers KC, Judy Stone KC and Simon Forshaw KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our three new employment silks - Amy Rogers KC, Judy Stone KC and Simon Forshaw KC - speak to Ruth Kennedy about a case from their final year as junior barristers.  They discuss team moves, post-employment restrictions, how solicitors can recover fees, and what they originally wanted to be when they grew up.<br/><br/>Host: Ruth Kennedy, <br/>Guests: Amy Rogers KC, Judy Stone KC and Simon Forshaw KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/14761598-the-silks-episode.mp3" length="14554516" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-14761598</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1208</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast, newsilks</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Miller:  Direct Discrimination and Anti-Zionism</itunes:title>
    <title>Miller:  Direct Discrimination and Anti-Zionism</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Edge talks to Hannah Slarks about Miller v University of Bristol 1400780/2022, an important first instance decision on protected belief discrimination.  To what extent is anti-Zionism a protected belief?  Andrew and Hannah examine how Higgs and Forstater play out in practice.  Does the law now mean that an employer can be guilty of direct discrimination when motivated by an employee’s objectionable manifestation of their belief – rather than the belief itself?  Host: Han...]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Edge talks to Hannah Slarks about <em>Miller v University of Bristol </em>1400780/2022, an important first instance decision on protected belief discrimination.  To what extent is anti-Zionism a protected belief?  Andrew and Hannah examine how Higgs and Forstater play out in practice.  Does the law now mean that an employer can be guilty of direct discrimination when motivated by an employee’s objectionable manifestation of their belief – rather than the belief itself?<br/><br/>Host: Hannah Slarks<br/>Guest: Andrew Edge<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Edge talks to Hannah Slarks about <em>Miller v University of Bristol </em>1400780/2022, an important first instance decision on protected belief discrimination.  To what extent is anti-Zionism a protected belief?  Andrew and Hannah examine how Higgs and Forstater play out in practice.  Does the law now mean that an employer can be guilty of direct discrimination when motivated by an employee’s objectionable manifestation of their belief – rather than the belief itself?<br/><br/>Host: Hannah Slarks<br/>Guest: Andrew Edge<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/14592255-miller-direct-discrimination-and-anti-zionism.mp3" length="22206051" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-14592255</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1846</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Jump Trading: Non-competes and Speedy Trials</itunes:title>
    <title>Jump Trading: Non-competes and Speedy Trials</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Rupert Paines talks to Katherine Taunton about Verition v Jump Trading [2023] EWCA Civ 701. How long is too long to keep an employee out of the market? Is a variable-length restrictive covenant permissible? And how does delay factor into injunction applications?  Host: Katherine Taunton Guest: Rupert Paines  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw   ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Paines talks to Katherine Taunton about <em>Verition v Jump Trading </em>[2023] EWCA Civ 701.<em> </em>How long is too long to keep an employee out of the market? Is a variable-length restrictive covenant permissible? And how does delay factor into injunction applications?<br/><br/>Host: Katherine Taunton<br/>Guest: Rupert Paines<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Paines talks to Katherine Taunton about <em>Verition v Jump Trading </em>[2023] EWCA Civ 701.<em> </em>How long is too long to keep an employee out of the market? Is a variable-length restrictive covenant permissible? And how does delay factor into injunction applications?<br/><br/>Host: Katherine Taunton<br/>Guest: Rupert Paines<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/14368199-jump-trading-non-competes-and-speedy-trials.mp3" length="24745460" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-14368199</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>2058</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Deliveroo: Supreme Court on Worker Status and Article 11</itunes:title>
    <title>Deliveroo: Supreme Court on Worker Status and Article 11</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Dan Stilitz KC talks to new tenant Lucy Jones about Independent Workers Union of Great Britain v Central Arbitration Committee and another [2023] UKSC 43. What is the latest from the Supreme Court on worker status?  And, to what extent does Article 11 provide a right to compulsory collective bargaining?  Host: Lucy Jones Guest: Daniel Stilitz KC  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Dan Stilitz KC talks to new tenant Lucy Jones about <em>Independent Workers Union of Great Britain v Central Arbitration Committee and another </em>[2023] UKSC 43.<em> </em>What is the latest from the Supreme Court on worker status?  And, to what extent does Article 11 provide a right to compulsory collective bargaining?<br/><br/>Host: Lucy Jones<br/>Guest: Daniel Stilitz KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Stilitz KC talks to new tenant Lucy Jones about <em>Independent Workers Union of Great Britain v Central Arbitration Committee and another </em>[2023] UKSC 43.<em> </em>What is the latest from the Supreme Court on worker status?  And, to what extent does Article 11 provide a right to compulsory collective bargaining?<br/><br/>Host: Lucy Jones<br/>Guest: Daniel Stilitz KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/14132335-deliveroo-supreme-court-on-worker-status-and-article-11.mp3" length="19815238" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-14132335</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1647</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Steel v Spencer Road: Bonus Clawback Provisions</itunes:title>
    <title>Steel v Spencer Road: Bonus Clawback Provisions</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Mike Lee talks to Christian Davies about Steel v Spencer Road LLP (Omerta) [2023] EWHC 2492 (Ch). When will a bonus clawback provision be a restraint of trade?   Host: Christian Davies Guest: Mike Lee  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Mike Lee talks to Christian Davies about Steel v Spencer Road LLP (Omerta) [2023] EWHC 2492 (Ch).<em> </em>When will a bonus clawback provision be a restraint of trade?<br/><br/><br/>Host: Christian Davies<br/>Guest: Mike Lee<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Lee talks to Christian Davies about Steel v Spencer Road LLP (Omerta) [2023] EWHC 2492 (Ch).<em> </em>When will a bonus clawback provision be a restraint of trade?<br/><br/><br/>Host: Christian Davies<br/>Guest: Mike Lee<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/13976866-steel-v-spencer-road-bonus-clawback-provisions.mp3" length="14726358" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-13976866</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1223</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast, Restraintoftrade, EmploymentLaw</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Agnew: The Supreme Court on Holiday Pay</itunes:title>
    <title>Agnew: The Supreme Court on Holiday Pay</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sean Jones KC talks to new tenant Aliya Al-Yassin about Chief Constable of Northern Ireland v Agnew [2023] UKSC 33, and somehow gives us a complete history of holiday pay in (almost) half an hour. When can an employee claim for a series of payments?  Host: Aliya Al-Yassin Guest: Sean Jones KC  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Sean Jones KC talks to new tenant Aliya Al-Yassin about Chief Constable of Northern Ireland v Agnew [2023] UKSC 33, and somehow gives us a complete history of holiday pay in (almost) half an hour.<em> </em>When can an employee claim for a series of payments?<br/><br/>Host: Aliya Al-Yassin<br/>Guest: Sean Jones KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean Jones KC talks to new tenant Aliya Al-Yassin about Chief Constable of Northern Ireland v Agnew [2023] UKSC 33, and somehow gives us a complete history of holiday pay in (almost) half an hour.<em> </em>When can an employee claim for a series of payments?<br/><br/>Host: Aliya Al-Yassin<br/>Guest: Sean Jones KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/13803497-agnew-the-supreme-court-on-holiday-pay.mp3" length="26779239" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-13803497</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 19:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>2227</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Clifford v Millicom: Privacy Orders</itunes:title>
    <title>Clifford v Millicom: Privacy Orders</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Paddy Halliday talks to Leo Davidson about Clifford v Millicom [2023] EWCA Civ 50, a welcome Court of Appeal judgment containing a roadmap for Rule 50.  What principles will the ET apply when deciding whether to grant a privacy order?  Host: Leo Davidson Guest: Paddy Halliday  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Paddy Halliday talks to Leo Davidson about Clifford v Millicom [2023] EWCA Civ 50, a welcome Court of Appeal judgment containing a roadmap for Rule 50.  What principles will the ET apply when deciding whether to grant a privacy order?<br/><br/>Host: Leo Davidson<br/>Guest: Paddy Halliday<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paddy Halliday talks to Leo Davidson about Clifford v Millicom [2023] EWCA Civ 50, a welcome Court of Appeal judgment containing a roadmap for Rule 50.  What principles will the ET apply when deciding whether to grant a privacy order?<br/><br/>Host: Leo Davidson<br/>Guest: Paddy Halliday<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/13632765-clifford-v-millicom-privacy-orders.mp3" length="24023580" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-13632765</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1998</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Boydell v NZP Ltd: The Court of Appeal on Covenants Again</itunes:title>
    <title>Boydell v NZP Ltd: The Court of Appeal on Covenants Again</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Judy Stone talks to Raphael Hogarth about Boydell v NZP Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 373. When can a non-compete clause stop a departing employee from doing something that… doesn’t compete?  Host: Raphael Hogarth Guest: Judy Stone  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Judy Stone talks to Raphael Hogarth about Boydell v NZP Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 373. When can a non-compete clause stop a departing employee from doing something that… doesn’t compete?<br/><br/>Host: Raphael Hogarth<br/>Guest: Judy Stone<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy Stone talks to Raphael Hogarth about Boydell v NZP Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 373. When can a non-compete clause stop a departing employee from doing something that… doesn’t compete?<br/><br/>Host: Raphael Hogarth<br/>Guest: Judy Stone<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/13470500-boydell-v-nzp-ltd-the-court-of-appeal-on-covenants-again.mp3" length="14661495" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-13470500</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 17:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1217</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords> UKemplaw, 11KBW, 11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Higgs v Farmor: Manifestation of belief</itunes:title>
    <title>Higgs v Farmor: Manifestation of belief</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Hannah Slarks talks to Ben Mitchell about the important decision in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89. How do the legal tests for belief discrimination work together?  Host: Ben Mitchell Guest: Hannah Slarks  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Hannah Slarks talks to Ben Mitchell about the important decision in <em>Higgs v Farmor’s School</em> [2023] EAT 89. How do the legal tests for belief discrimination work together?<br/><br/>Host: Ben Mitchell<br/>Guest: Hannah Slarks<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hannah Slarks talks to Ben Mitchell about the important decision in <em>Higgs v Farmor’s School</em> [2023] EAT 89. How do the legal tests for belief discrimination work together?<br/><br/>Host: Ben Mitchell<br/>Guest: Hannah Slarks<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/13291286-higgs-v-farmor-manifestation-of-belief.mp3" length="17959189" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-13291286</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 11:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1492</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords> #UKemplaw, #11KBW, #11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Lycatel v Schneider: Concurrent Proceedings</itunes:title>
    <title>Lycatel v Schneider: Concurrent Proceedings</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Katherine Taunton talks to Michael White about Lycatel Services Ltd v Schneider [2023] EAT 81. How do you persuade a judge that your client’s case should be heard first in their preferred forum, whether that’s the ET or the High Court?  Host: Michael White Guest: Katherine Taunton  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Katherine Taunton talks to Michael White about Lycatel Services Ltd v Schneider [2023] EAT 81.<em> </em>How do you persuade a judge that your client’s case should be heard first in their preferred forum, whether that’s the ET or the High Court?<br/><br/>Host: Michael White<br/>Guest: Katherine Taunton<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katherine Taunton talks to Michael White about Lycatel Services Ltd v Schneider [2023] EAT 81.<em> </em>How do you persuade a judge that your client’s case should be heard first in their preferred forum, whether that’s the ET or the High Court?<br/><br/>Host: Michael White<br/>Guest: Katherine Taunton<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/13124430-lycatel-v-schneider-concurrent-proceedings.mp3" length="14208504" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-13124430</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1180</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>#UKemplaw, #11KBW, #11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Higgs and Rolec: Bias on the Bench</itunes:title>
    <title>Higgs and Rolec: Bias on the Bench</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Aileen McColgan KC talks to Daniel Isenberg about toxic debates, conflicting beliefs and opinionated judges in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 45 and Rolec Ltd v Georgiou [2023] EAT 46.  When must a judge be recused to avoid the appearance of bias?  Host: Daniel Isenberg Guest: Aileen McColgan KC  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Aileen McColgan KC talks to Daniel Isenberg about toxic debates, conflicting beliefs and opinionated judges in <em>Higgs v Farmor’s School</em> [2023] EAT 45 and <em>Rolec Ltd v Georgiou</em> [2023] EAT 46.  When must a judge be recused to avoid the appearance of bias?<br/><br/>Host: Daniel Isenberg<br/>Guest: Aileen McColgan KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aileen McColgan KC talks to Daniel Isenberg about toxic debates, conflicting beliefs and opinionated judges in <em>Higgs v Farmor’s School</em> [2023] EAT 45 and <em>Rolec Ltd v Georgiou</em> [2023] EAT 46.  When must a judge be recused to avoid the appearance of bias?<br/><br/>Host: Daniel Isenberg<br/>Guest: Aileen McColgan KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/12859525-higgs-and-rolec-bias-on-the-bench.mp3" length="19916390" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-12859525</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 16:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1655</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>#UKemploymentlaw, #11KBW, #11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Benyatov v Credit Suisse: Implied Indemnities and Limits on Career Losses</itunes:title>
    <title>Benyatov v Credit Suisse: Implied Indemnities and Limits on Career Losses</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Richard Leiper KC talks to Katherine Eddy about Benyatov v Credit Suisse (Securities) Europe Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 140.  When an employee is wrongly convicted for acts done in the course of employment, is the employer liable for the financial losses that follow?   Host: Katherine Eddy Guest: Richard Leiper  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Richard Leiper KC talks to Katherine Eddy about <em>Benyatov v Credit Suisse (Securities) Europe Ltd</em> [2023] EWCA Civ 140.  When an employee is wrongly convicted for acts done in the course of employment, is the employer liable for the financial losses that follow?<br/> <br/>Host: Katherine Eddy<br/>Guest: Richard Leiper<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Leiper KC talks to Katherine Eddy about <em>Benyatov v Credit Suisse (Securities) Europe Ltd</em> [2023] EWCA Civ 140.  When an employee is wrongly convicted for acts done in the course of employment, is the employer liable for the financial losses that follow?<br/> <br/>Host: Katherine Eddy<br/>Guest: Richard Leiper<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/12725779-benyatov-v-credit-suisse-implied-indemnities-and-limits-on-career-losses.mp3" length="20168558" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-12725779</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 07:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1676</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>#UKemploymentlaw, #11KBW, #11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Kong v Gulf International Bank: The Whistleblowing “Separability Principle”</itunes:title>
    <title>Kong v Gulf International Bank: The Whistleblowing “Separability Principle”</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jamie Susskind talks to Katherine Taunton about Kong v Gulf International Bank [2022] EWCA Civ 941.  When an employer fires a whistleblower, the Tribunal has to decide why they were fired. How can the Tribunal separate the fact that the person blew the whistle from the way that they did it?   Host: Katherine Taunton Guest: Jamie Susskind  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Jamie Susskind talks to Katherine Taunton about <em>Kong v Gulf International Bank</em> [2022] EWCA Civ 941.  When an employer fires a whistleblower, the Tribunal has to decide why they were fired. How can the Tribunal separate the fact that the person blew the whistle from the way that they did it? <br/><br/>Host: Katherine Taunton<br/>Guest: Jamie Susskind<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie Susskind talks to Katherine Taunton about <em>Kong v Gulf International Bank</em> [2022] EWCA Civ 941.  When an employer fires a whistleblower, the Tribunal has to decide why they were fired. How can the Tribunal separate the fact that the person blew the whistle from the way that they did it? <br/><br/>Host: Katherine Taunton<br/>Guest: Jamie Susskind<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/12452365-kong-v-gulf-international-bank-the-whistleblowing-separability-principle.mp3" length="14353644" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-12452365</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1192</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>#11KBWemploymentpodcast, #11KBW, #UKemploymentlaw</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Planon v Gilligan: The Court of Appeal on Interim Relief for Non-competes</itunes:title>
    <title>Planon v Gilligan: The Court of Appeal on Interim Relief for Non-competes</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Amy Rogers talks to Mike Lee about Planon v Gilligan [2022] EWCA Civ 642 [2022] I.R.L.R. 684.  What can we learn from a rare Court of Appeal judgment on interim relief in the employee competition context?  Host: Mike Lee Guest: Amy Rogers  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Amy Rogers talks to Mike Lee about <em>Planon v Gilligan</em> [2022] EWCA Civ 642 [2022] I.R.L.R. 684.  What can we learn from a rare Court of Appeal judgment on interim relief in the employee competition context?<br/><br/>Host: Mike Lee<br/>Guest: Amy Rogers<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy Rogers talks to Mike Lee about <em>Planon v Gilligan</em> [2022] EWCA Civ 642 [2022] I.R.L.R. 684.  What can we learn from a rare Court of Appeal judgment on interim relief in the employee competition context?<br/><br/>Host: Mike Lee<br/>Guest: Amy Rogers<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a><br/><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/12259135-planon-v-gilligan-the-court-of-appeal-on-interim-relief-for-non-competes.mp3" length="19410589" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-12259135</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1613</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>#UKemploymentlaw, #11KBW, #11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Piepenbrock: Anonymity Orders - Private Lives and Public Lies</itunes:title>
    <title>Piepenbrock: Anonymity Orders - Private Lives and Public Lies</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Dan Stilitz KC talks to Oliver Jackson about anonymity orders in Piepenbrock v London School of Economic and Political Science [2022] EAT 119.  When will the Tribunal make an anonymity order to protect details about someone’s private life?  Host: Oliver Jackson Guest: Dan Stilitz KC  www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Dan Stilitz KC talks to Oliver Jackson about anonymity orders in <em>Piepenbrock v London School of Economic and Political Science</em> [2022] EAT 119.  When will the Tribunal make an anonymity order to protect details about someone’s private life?</p><p><br/>Host: Oliver Jackson<br/>Guest: Dan Stilitz KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Stilitz KC talks to Oliver Jackson about anonymity orders in <em>Piepenbrock v London School of Economic and Political Science</em> [2022] EAT 119.  When will the Tribunal make an anonymity order to protect details about someone’s private life?</p><p><br/>Host: Oliver Jackson<br/>Guest: Dan Stilitz KC<br/><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/12067229-piepenbrock-anonymity-orders-private-lives-and-public-lies.mp3" length="22454316" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>Oliver Jackson, Dan Stilitz KC</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-12067229</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1867</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>#UKemploymentlaw, #11KBW, #11KBWemploymentpodcast</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Loreley: Hidden Identities and Litigation Privilege</itunes:title>
    <title>Loreley: Hidden Identities and Litigation Privilege</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Judy Stone talks to Ruth Kennedy about litigation privilege in Loreley Financing v Credit Suisse Securities and others [2022] EWCA Civ 1484.  Can client identities hide behind litigation privilege?  Host: Ruth Kennedy Guest: Judy Stone www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Judy Stone talks to Ruth Kennedy about litigation privilege in <em>Loreley Financing v Credit Suisse Securities and others</em> [2022] EWCA Civ 1484.  Can client identities hide behind litigation privilege?<br/><br/>Host: Ruth Kennedy<br/>Guest: Judy Stone</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy Stone talks to Ruth Kennedy about litigation privilege in <em>Loreley Financing v Credit Suisse Securities and others</em> [2022] EWCA Civ 1484.  Can client identities hide behind litigation privilege?<br/><br/>Host: Ruth Kennedy<br/>Guest: Judy Stone</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/11831956-loreley-hidden-identities-and-litigation-privilege.mp3" length="11754007" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>Ruth Kennedy, Judy Stone</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-11831956</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>975</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>#UKemploymentlaw, #litigation, #disputeresolution</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>McClung and Mackereth: Football, Gender and Protected Beliefs</itunes:title>
    <title>McClung and Mackereth: Football, Gender and Protected Beliefs</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sean Jones KC talks to Andrew Smith about religion or belief discrimination in McClung v Doosan Babcock 4110538/2019 23 August 2022 and  Mackereth v DWP [2022] EAT 99.  What do these cases about football fandom and gender critical beliefs tell us about the Tribunal’s approach to protected beliefs?  Host: Andrew Smith Guest: Sean Jones KC www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw  On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Sean Jones KC talks to Andrew Smith about religion or belief discrimination in <em>McClung v Doosan Babcock</em> 4110538/2019 23 August 2022 and  <em>Mackereth v DWP </em>[2022] EAT 99.  What do these cases about football fandom and gender critical beliefs tell us about the Tribunal’s approach to protected beliefs?<br/><br/>Host: Andrew Smith<br/>Guest: Sean Jones KC</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean Jones KC talks to Andrew Smith about religion or belief discrimination in <em>McClung v Doosan Babcock</em> 4110538/2019 23 August 2022 and  <em>Mackereth v DWP </em>[2022] EAT 99.  What do these cases about football fandom and gender critical beliefs tell us about the Tribunal’s approach to protected beliefs?<br/><br/>Host: Andrew Smith<br/>Guest: Sean Jones KC</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p><br/>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/11700400-mcclung-and-mackereth-football-gender-and-protected-beliefs.mp3" length="29151203" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author></itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-11700400</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>2425</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords>#employmentlaw, #discriminationlaw</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
  <item>
    <itunes:title>Swiss Re: Threats, Offers and the WP Rule</itunes:title>
    <title>Swiss Re: Threats, Offers and the WP Rule</title>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Edge talks to Hannah Slarks about his case, Swiss Re v Sommer [2022] IRLR 650.  When will allegations of misconduct and costs warnings cross the line in WP correspondence?  Host: Hannah Slarks Guest: Andrew Edge www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/ www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW. ]]></itunes:summary>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Edge talks to Hannah Slarks about his case, <em>Swiss Re v Sommer</em> [2022] IRLR 650.  When will allegations of misconduct and costs warnings cross the line in WP correspondence?<br/><br/>Host: Hannah Slarks<br/>Guest: Andrew Edge</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Edge talks to Hannah Slarks about his case, <em>Swiss Re v Sommer</em> [2022] IRLR 650.  When will allegations of misconduct and costs warnings cross the line in WP correspondence?<br/><br/>Host: Hannah Slarks<br/>Guest: Andrew Edge</p><p><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.11kbw.com%2Fpractice-areas%2Femployment%2F&amp;token=2809f5-1-1666096880125'>www.11kbw.com/practice-areas/employment/</a><br/><a href='https://gate.sc/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F11kbw&amp;token=d219ba-1-1666096880126'>www.linkedin.com/company/11kbw</a></p><p>On Twitter, we’re @11KBW and on LinkedIn, we’re 11KBW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2068323/episodes/11521561-swiss-re-threats-offers-and-the-wp-rule.mp3" length="19551843" type="audio/mpeg" />
    <itunes:author>11KBW Employment Team</itunes:author>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-11521561</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 13:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <itunes:duration>1625</itunes:duration>
    <itunes:keywords> #employmentlaw, #withoutprejudice</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
